
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
for compensation is complete nonsense.
One more reason to think about it.
Strategy A) 1 sell gbpjpy 1 buy gbpusd 1 buy usdjpy - your setup is always profit
Then
Strategy B) 1 buy gbpjpy 1 sell gbpusd 1 sell usdjpy - always profit
But really, what is the difference between the strategies.
Suppose the DC allows locks, then we run strategy A and B at the same time - What do we get? - Steady and unwavering minus because of the difference in the buy and sell price
Suppose you make the assumption that you have to choose the moment, calculate, analyze, then you go straight to the field of ... to the field of miracles
I don't think I'm the owner of a broker that does not have drawdowns.
Read carefully what I have written for you. Where do you see a profit, even a very, very small and a very, very short period of time?
You are the owner of a brokerage company.
I wonder where such an instrument is found - chfaud? There is only AUDCHF, but it has more swap on sell than gbpaud on sell
I wonder where such an instrument is found - chfaud? There is only AUDCHF, but it has more swap on sell than gbpaud on sell
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/128593 I thought so too, and it turns out there is
Read carefully what I wrote for YOU. Where do YOU see a profit of even a very, very small amount of time over a very, very short period of time?
Ahhhhhh, you are the owner of the DC.
I have posted a report than you do not profit, but exactly the same will be and minus the question only in a month which will be more
or for trading on swaps very little, but probably not overcritical too
Why do you open 3 positions at once? chfaud - gbpaud - gbpchf. You need two positions with one denominator CHF.
gbpaud is not necessary, the swap should be equal if possible. You should wait for the profit position, the trade would be profitable, and not loss-making. It is not clear from the report how long it took you to close the losing position.
Why do you open 3 positions at once? chfaud - gbpaud - gbpchf. This way you need two positions with the same denominator CHF.
gbpaud is redundant here, also if possible the swap should be equal. Also, you should have waited for a profitable position, and the trade would have been profitable instead of losing. It is not clear from the report after how long you closed the losing position.
I wonder how you do the math and set the lock.
You have a funny brokerage house))
You have a cheerful DC))
strange as it may seem but it is a bank and not the last one in ukraine