Brain-training tasks related to trading in one way or another. Theorist, game theory, etc. - page 11
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
How to mathematically estimate/compare (which is better) the profitability of the two transaction options.
X - Spread in pips
Z - size of win in pips
Z - size of loss in pips
Y - probability of winning
-------------------------------------------------------
With the actual other trade with different indicators. Probably need some sort of formula...
How to mathematically estimate/compare (which is better) the profitability of the two transaction options.
X - Spread in pips
Z - size of win in pips
Z - size of loss in pips
Y - probability of winning
-------------------------------------------------------
With the actual other trade with different indicators. Probably need some kind of formula...
Here's the thing.
Suppose we play eagle/dash.
We lose 2 and win 3. For the sake of simplicity, let's discard the spread.
3*0.5-2*0.5 = 0.5
Now we face the task what percentage of equity should be invested to maximize its growth.
Again, this is pure mathematics... how to calculate it I do not remember. Let's assume 25% - gives the maximum.
Next, we need to determine the average percentage capital growth per trade - this growth rate of %/growth / N - (transactions) will be the evaluation of the strategy.
How do you calculate it?
**************************************************************
Here's an example let it be MO=1 coin, not 0.5.
And the chance of winning is 1%. I'm sure the capital gain rate will be minimal.
Here's the thing.
Suppose we play eagle/dash.
We lose 2 and win 3. For the sake of simplicity, let's discard the spread.
3*0.5-2*0.5 = 0.5
Now we face the task what percentage of equity should be invested to maximize its growth.
Again, this is pure mathematics... how to calculate it I do not remember. Let's assume 25% - gives the maximum.
Next, we need to determine the average percentage capital growth per trade - this growth rate of %/growth / N - (transactions) will be the evaluation of the strategy.
How do you calculate it?
**************************************************************
Here's an example let it be MO=1 coin, not 0.5.
And the chance of winning is 1%. Surely the rate of capital gains will be minimal.
For such purposes, there is the Kelly Jr. formula:
stake = ((b + 1) * p - 1) / b
Where:
stake is the rate as a percentage of the deposit
b - potential win in money / potential loss in money
p - probability of potential winning
((3+1)*0.5-1)/2=0.5 - 50%
Is this the correct solution for the Eagle/Reshku problem?
Thank you.
((3+1)*0.5-1)/2=0.5 - 50%
Is this the correct solution for the Eagle/Reshku problem?
Thank you.
b - potential gain in money / potential loss in money = 3 / 2 = 1.5
((1.5 + 1) *0.5 - 1) / 1.5 = 0.16666666666666666666666666666667
Made a check in Excel
via solution search
maximum is reached at 28%
Made a check in Excel
via solution search
maximum is reached at 28%
TVA_11:
Made a check in Excel
via solution search
the maximum is reached at 28%.
You need to learn basic arithmetic first, so that you can use the formula to get the right result. You do not know how to do this yet, but you get into Excel and try to "disprove" an already proven and repeatedly tested and rechecked formula with some inarticulate nonsense.
In Excel, the check is very simple:
Column A is the share, column B is the increase in the deposit after two coin flips. The cursor is at the maximum value of column B. To make it clear how the calculations were performed, the value of cell B17 is shown at the top of the screen.
I will reveal the essence of Excel. It's simple and obvious.
Depo*** interest **size **win or
******* of the deposit *** bet **size **win (size)
100*028=28 we won 2 coins. 2*28 = 56
the depo became 156
156*0.28=43.68 we lost 1 coin -43.68
depo became 112,32.
and so on. There is no mistake here.
*****************************************
The question is more about using the Kelly formula correctly.
Are we putting the right values in there?