Avalanche - page 419

 
khorosh:

Please explain to a layman what the effect and benefit of using EQ(...) is.


It pleases the eye ))))
 
artikul:

Good for the eye ))))
I see, I wish it had been :-)))
 
khorosh:

Hooray! I've got 610 trades since July 15, 2010!!! So you can rely seriously. :-)))

I have >20,000 trades in 3 years

and he's actually losing the bastard... There's a lot to consider here.

 
Necron:

I have >20,000 trades in 3 years

and he's actually losing the bastard... There's a lot to consider here.

What's the picture on the ticks?
 

In the meantime, I continue to test the simplest version of the avalanche on the demo....

And this is what we have at the moment:

Files:
cfisxbmpwpx.rar  29 kb
 
Galina:

In the meantime, I continue to test the simplest version of the avalanche on the demo....

And this is what we have at the moment:

What's the point?

You can test an Avalanche for 10 years, and on the 11th, you can drain it all in a couple of days.

Avalanche's success in the past proves absolutely nothing for it in the future

 

It also occurred to me to run this principle on two currency pairs at the same time.

I started a new demo yesterday.

The result pleasantly surprises me.

Trading is going in different directions, which considerably reduces risks.

For example, if on eu is open longs, then on pound shorts and so on.

Sometimes positions are opened in one direction, but, as a rule, in such cases price quickly comes to profit.

Anyway, I am still watching it.

And here, in the report you can see what happens at the moment.

Files:
yllhddohslp.rar  11 kb
 
khorosh:
What's the picture on ticks?

Too lazy to test =) in the EA everything just goes after return, i.e. it starts once at bar opening.

PS. drawdown will not tell what! :D guess it yourself))))

 
Diamant:

What's the point?

Avalanche can be tested for 10 years and on the 11th, it's all leaked in a couple of days.

Avalanche's success in the past proves absolutely nothing for it in the future


That's right, that's right.

It just seems to me that there must be a way to use it "right".

I'm convinced that whoever's looking will find it sooner or later.

For example, it occurs to me that some arbitrage, by trading on different pairs, may lead to positive results.

I will look for who knows...

 
Galina:


That's right, that's right.

It just seems to me that there must be a way to use it in the "right" way.

I am convinced that whoever is looking will find it sooner or later.

For example, it has occurred to me that some arbitrage, by trading on different pairs, may bring this system to a positive result.

I will look for who knows...

This has already been discussed here!
Reason: