[Archive!] Pure mathematics, physics, chemistry, etc.: brain-training problems not related to trade in any way - page 569

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It turns out this: if, for example, the ISS had the same angular rate of rotation as the Earth, it would fall to the Earth.
Earth's angular rate for the ISS is irrelevant
at her current height? Yes.
Pisces, and what obviously saves the earth from falling into the sun is the angular velocity of the sun.
It turns out this: if, for example, the ISS had the same angular rate of rotation as the Earth, it would fall to the Earth.
No, it wouldn't. There are geostationary satellites - hovering over one point of the earth. It makes no difference to satellites (or rather gravitational force) whether the earth is spinning or not.
They are hovering at an altitude of 40,000km and the ISS is much lower.
----
PS: Calculated maximum height of steel pipe (at steel strength limit - 400 MPa) - it will be about 5 km. There is not enough strength to reach space. The pipe should probably be pyramidal in shape.
PS: Calculated the maximum height of a steel pipe (at a steel strength limit of 400 MPa) - it would be about 5 km.
The pipe should probably be pyramid-shaped.
They are hovering at an altitude of 40,000km and the ISS is much lower.
----
PS: Calculated maximum height of steel pipe (at steel strength limit - 400 MPa) - it will be about 5 km. There is not enough strength to reach space. The pipe should probably be pyramidal in shape.
I knew it. Mosquito recommended it?
hmmm... I wrote earlier - read the works of Tsiolkovsky - he gave calculations of space lifts there... maybe you'll find something useful....
They are hovering at an altitude of 40,000 km and the ISS is much lower.
...