A career in stock trading - page 5
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I mean, creating a trading advisor that would be profitable in principle. I am a typical office worker with a technical background and I want to earn money on the forex market as advertised. So I ask, is there anyone who has no specific financial education and relevant training in their specialty, which would earn serious money here? Although, somewhere - somewhere inside sits a worm of doubt, why humanity flies into space, develops nanotechnology, and to create and sell all the iron profitable adviser willing, like a recipe for a cookbook can not make people dive into the intricacies of programming and stock exchange business? Will not it be a waste of time, and do not I better create a firm to produce diplomas and term papers (as my friends), where my skills and knowledge, will definitely be paid, but without any hint of super-profits? And maybe there's no iron profitable adviser, maybe it's all a fog and visions, and DC are firms that sell for real money equipment and ammunition, for wishing to try to get rich?
No... Amateurism is not going to fly here, unlike the business of writing diplomas and term papers. At least it hasn't worked for me yet.)
And finally stop calling forex a stock exchange. Even wikipedia is good to read sometimes...
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Форекс_(currency_market)
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Биржа
And stop calling forex an exchange at last. Even Wikipedia is useful to read sometimes...
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Форекс_(currency_market)
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Биржа
Well, if you are being generous with terminology, it's not even forex, it's "supposedly forex".
Well, to be more precise in questions of terminology, it is not even forex but "allegedly forex".
Somewhere I read that FOREX is a trashy interbank, and that "forex" is what the DCs advertise ("supposedly forex").
Nah... Amateurism won't fly here, unlike the business of writing diplomas and term papers. At least it hasn't worked for me yet).
And finally stop calling forex an exchange. Even wikipedia is good to read sometimes...
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Форекс_(currency_market)
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Биржа
>>How much do such smart currency traders earn now, if it's no secret?
>> Well, to be generous with terminology, it's not even forex, it's "supposedly forex".
>> Uh-huh.
How much do such smart people earn in the foreign exchange market these days, if that's not a secret?
You mean "literate", not "smart" perhaps?)
vasya_vasya let it be known - the Stock Exchange is a real sector of the economy, and not an insignificant one.
Why should our state machine be so worried about allocating 25bn (if I'm not mistaken) from the Stab Fund to support the value of some banknotes in a crisis? (if I'm not mistaken) from the Stab Fund to support the value of some notes?
And Mr. Milovidov, did he switch off the switch at the drop on his own initiative?
I wonder, by the way, what, in your opinion, real value is created by, say, lawyers?
I am not going to argue about the stock exchange, a buy and hold strategy will do, you do not even have to learn anything.
I'm talking about forex and real money that can be earned.
Lawyers get paid money. What they produce is called a service.
Traders, especially beginners, usually don't get paid. Yes, the traders are sitting at the monitor, they are moving their brains, but they take the money from the traders, that is, from themselves.
Traders are very useful for the economy, no matter what they say about oil prices being detached from supply and demand. Without traders there would be no such liquidity, the market would be terribly unstable.
Except that no one pays traders in the aggregate for their good works. That is why at the initial stage a trader is not profitable and is much less useful than a beginning doctor or an engineer.
You mean 'literate', not 'smart' perhaps?)
What's the difference, don't get sidetracked by the question. Do you get enough of what you earn here?
Who cares, don't get sidetracked by the question, are you satisfied with what you earn here?
I have "almost nothing" enough, so with my current income I can even save for the future =)
I'm quite happy with 'almost nothing', so with my current income level I'm even able to save for the future =)
YOU GUYS ARE HILARIOUS, 5+.