"The 'perfect' trading system - page 68
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I think I found the answer here -
"Adaptive EA is different from other EAs in that it cannot be 'broken'"
That's right, he bought and broke "other" EAs with a hammer
Many other inhabitants of this forum have posted much of the formalized working code in the Code Base without you.
Another thing is that clear formalization and workability of algorithms do not guarantee their profitability. Even if the algorithm is patented. And as the world experience shows, the Nobel Prize is not a guarantee either. On the contrary, the more degrees of protection, the higher the probability that you are dealing with crap wrapped in a beautiful candy wrapper with an accompanying inscription "Beware of fakes".
Nobel Prizes are not time machines, what Nobel Prize are we talking about? Of course the winners there are all idiots, Combo Right rules, or whatever your "cybernetic toilet flush level controller" is something "non-trivial" and beautiful and without any Nobel Prizes.
Honestly, what's the deal with these Smarties? One for free, the others for $7, $77, $777 and $777? What kind of circus is this?
The result of a digital brain
The result of a digital brain
Apparently the brain is very clever.....))))
Apparently the brain is very clever.....))))
>>This brain is handmade by the author :)
Yes, Angela. Now you'll think a hundred times about the name of the topic before you create it. It's like the perpetual motion machine - crazy people's paradise. So this thread has turned into a yellow house for one patient.
It's a shame. There's no point in posting on the topic here. It's a clusterfuck.
Honestly, what is all this nonsense with these Smarties? One for free, others for 7, 77, 777 and 777$? What kind of circus is this?
Maybe they want to compensate for the losses incurred at PAMM? :D
It's like the perpetual motion machine - crazy people's paradise.
>> superunique exists
The "law" of energy conservation is a particular case of empirical observation
superuniqueness exists
>> the "law" of conservation of energy is a particular case of empirical observation
Everything is such a "special" case. Science does not explain, it merely describes the status quo. Empirically. With varying degrees of plausibility.