"The 'perfect' trading system - page 37
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It does not matter.
All that matters is the practical result which confirms the correctness of the theory.
I do not understand the logic. PAMM is losing money, and somewhere out there are super profits. What's the fun in it?
The practical result, confirming the theory, we see on PAMM, not on the screen.
Investors, looking at the screens, lick their lips, and then investing in PAMM, suck ... They get their paw...
That's the theory and the practice. What else can we prove?
Let me remind you where we started our discussion:
"At the link, lies an adaptive algorithm that satisfies your criteria:
1. ability to learn and adapt
2. only 1 optimizable parameter"
With an example of an Expert Advisor, that meets the criteria we mentioned.
PAMM was "dragged" later by well-wishers - for an exercise in sophistry.
PAMM is another project.
I don't understand the logic. PAMM is losing money and there are super profits out there. Where's the fun in that?
Nothing.
>> PAMM is another project.
Victor, please don't change the readings, it's very difficult for me to understand,
Whether this robot is worth dealing with or not. Here is your last quote:
{...} PAMM was "dragged in" later by well-wishers - for the exercise of sophistry.
PAMM is a different project.
One of the previous quotes:
It's on PAMM. It was temporarily disabled because of the hairpin quotation. We will restart it soon.
Otherwise, everything is better on PAMM than it seems from the outside.
Victor, please don't change your statement or I find it very difficult to understand,
Whether this robot is worth dealing with or not. Here is your last quote:
One of the previous quotes:
There are more than 10 other adaptive trading robots on PAMM, in addition to the adaptive EA - see more:
PAMM
See more about the hairpin:
Stiletto in quotes
In addition to the Adaptive EA, PAMM has more than 10 other adaptive trading robots - see details:
PAMM
See more details about the hairpin:
Hairpin in quotes
Hmm... looks like you have a couple of adaptive robots on your forum too ;-).
Starting a correspondence at 4am is not something every person can do ;-).
.
And in general, I'm beginning to notice a strange tendency when
of people with generally bright minds expressing their own healthy thoughts...
In a somewhat veiled way, and by constantly provoking the interlocutors...
And in general, I'm starting to notice a strange tendency when
of people with generally bright minds expressing their own healthy thoughts...
in a somewhat veiled way, and constantly provoking their interlocutors...
It's a Zen Buddhist approach - normal. From the series "One Palm Clap". Otherwise it is impossible to grasp the underlying essence of TC.
And in general, I'm starting to notice a strange tendency when
people with generally bright minds expressing their own sensible thoughts...
In a somewhat veiled way and by constantly provoking interlocutors...
This is a specificity of traders' forums - any new ideas are vigorously trashed.
Some forums use this feature for their promotion.
I usually don't provoke anyone first - only in response - "wedge the wedge out".
Moreover, at times I have to wait until some "excessively hot interlocutors" have normalized their hormonal balance so that I could continue normal communication with them.
It's a Zen Buddhist approach - okay. From a series of "One palm claps". You can't grasp the underlying essence of TC otherwise.
Nonsense.
This is a consequence of the lack of a science of financial markets - there is no tool to describe non-strict entities.
See Example of an endless argument about the nature of the market :)
"Sergei Aleynikov, 39, wrote stock market bots for Goldman Sach Group that can (!) crash and manipulate financial markets."
By the way, this is what market-synchronised sinusoids look like: