SPAM, SPAMMERS and their ASSOCIATES... - page 79

 
FreeLance:

Have you repented? Or explained the "arbitrariness"?

;)


No one has repented, much less explained "arbitrariness"... there is someone to explain it to...

We are not bots, but human beings with inherent emotions etc...

 
Roman.:


No one repented, much less explained "arbitrariness"... there is someone to explain it to...

We are not bots, but human beings with inherent emotions etc...

That's what I mean.

Or did you see me as a botton?

о)

 
FreeLance:

A masterpiece of "context"!

;)


You're right to point out that the 'hosts' skip over such things (I mean the humour thread - where a lot is allowed),

And some people get slaughtered for nothing...

 
FreeLance:

That's what I mean.

Or did you see me as a botton?

о)


:-))) The beginning of the phrase - "We ..." :-))
 
Mathemat:


1. The deletion of the lasso branch and his ban will be dealt with. But not today.

2. Roman: What was the fight about?

1. Waiting...

2. An argument is being prepared, retrospectively, to take the branch down. I wonder what they'll come up with to justify the ban...

 
Roman.:


You are right to point out that the "masters" skip over such things (I mean the humour thread - where much is allowed),

And some people get slaughtered for nothing...


Give me at least a dozen links to "such things" from the Humor thread
 
sever30: 2. An argument for tearing down the thread is being prepared, retroactively. I wonder what they will come up with to justify the ban...

The thread has already been demolished and there is no way to restore it. An unfounded mate is enough of an argument to get it taken down, by the way. There was something else in the thread too. Petya did his best, too. Let's look into it.

P.S. The humour thread is also moderated if anything inappropriate is encountered.

 
Mathemat:

The thread has already been demolished and there is no way to restore it. An unfounded mate is enough of an argument to get it taken down, by the way. There was something else in the thread too. Petya did his best, too. Let's look into it.

P.S. The humour thread is also moderated if something unacceptable is found.

This Petya should have been restrained a long time ago. In general, I do not understand on what grounds people like Petia break into threads and begin to express their dissatisfaction with the fact that a branch was created? Who are they? Why are they not thrown out?

Let's consider the interests of all categories of traders. I, for example, don't care about the topic of ticks, ticks, ticks. What will happen if I barge in there like Petya and call everyone there? Banned the author and take down a thread, as with Fora & Roulette?

 

sever30:

Let's consider the interests of all categories of traders. I, for one, don't care about the topic of ticks, ticks, ticks.

This topic is not unreasonable, unlike. Can't you see the difference? However, that thread will probably be taken down soon.
 
Mischek:

Give me at least a dozen links to "similar things" from the Humour thread


What's a dozen links got to do with it, "similar stuff" is a quote from a FreeLance: post, a few posts above...

No more and no less...