"Trees don't grow to the sky" - page 62
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The answer to the branch's subheading: In fact - it's not growing.
Another one - the 'tree' - has deflated.
We should invest in them while they (the trees) are green! At the slightest sign of their fluttering and lazhAnost' - dump until better times!
P.S. It's time to get started while there's still some dough left!
The answer to the branch's subheading: In fact, they don't grow.
No way. It has grown, only in the other direction.
Yeah. Really... :-)
The answer to the branch's subheading: In fact - it's not growing.
Another one - the 'tree' - has deflated.
We should invest in them while they (the trees) are green! At the slightest sign of their fluttering and screwing up - dump them until better times!
P.S. It's time to get started while there's still some dough left!
You've got to be an Oak not to blow it out.
well, once every hundred years doesn't count.
The answer to the branch's subheading: In fact - it's not growing.
Another one - the 'tree' - has deflated.
We should invest in them while they (the trees) are green! At the slightest sign of their fluttering and faltering - dump them until better times!
P.S. It's time to start on your own while there's still some dough left!
It's a succession of moose
You have to be an Oak not to "deflate".
Well, once every hundred years doesn't count.
Mm-hmm.... Everything comes to an end sometime.
I have been working on this for a long time and I am not sure how to invest in PAMMs, because there is a high probability of losing them ))))
So the idea that it is safer to invest in long-lived PAMMs, because of their reliability, is not correct )))).
Mm-hmm.... Everything comes to an end sometime.
I have been working on this for a long time and I am not sure how to invest in PAMMs, because there is a high probability of losing them ))))
So the idea that it is safer to invest in long-lived PAMMs due to their reliability is not correct ))))
...
1. As a result, I started to think that investing in long-lived PAMMs makes no sense - there is a high probability of plum ))))
2. So, my opinion that investing in long-lived PAMMs is more safe because of their reliability is wrong )))).
1. absolutely correct. Got to this point myself (not without your help) - came up with it. Although. :-)
After all, in a previous post JOO - correctly writes that martin - dangerous for DEP...
Thankfully ExpensivBeier - his head has begun to raise a little, otherwise it was getting quite sad... :-)
2. I poured money into Leonid's PAMM trading the spreads, in hope of a permanent (quarterly) movement of the yield graph to the north-east! And he poured in - at the start!
Good luck to all of us!