Or that it is really not possible to make money on forex in the long term.
Everyone has to find the answer for themselves. I am not sure how much money I can make in the long run, but I will be closer to an answer. When I lose my own real, then I will be closer to an answer.)
Roman.: Entry/exit - see picture. As a result, about 20% is a loss on the 600 oyro invested in it.
Here, by the way, we as investors face the same problem as traders - investing at the highs and exiting at the lows, when it should be the other way round.
in the beginning they were looking for a forex trading system, now they are looking for the best paM account by chart, then they will bring money to the best paM account investor.
Here, by the way, we as investors face the same problem as traders - investing at the highs and exiting at the lows, when it should be the other way round.
How do you avoid this problem?
Well, why not... :-)
I poured at the drawdown, because the roll was 1 time per day, so the money came right out of it.
So, everything is good here - buy lowers, sell tops, the system is counter-trend... :-)
1. Here, by the way, we as investors face the same problem as traders - investing at the highs and exiting at the lows, although it should be the other way round.
2. How do you avoid this problem?
1. After all, I didn't go out on the August snot because there was - A SYSTEM... :-) In twenty-four hours - shot and all is well... :-)
You do not have it now, that is all.
You have to have your own system of trading and investing.
I was filling up on the drawdown, because the roll was once a day, so the money came right out of the drawdown.
So, all is well here - we buy the bottoms, sell the tops - the system is a counter-trend system... :-)
If the trend has begun, it will continue ... :-)
If the trader plays the system, it is really better to invest on failures, because a series of profitable trades is followed by a series of losing trades, and the more losing trades, the more likely profitable ones are. There is even a strategy to increase lot volume after a series of losing trades (not to be confused with martin). With each losing trade the probability of a profitable one increases. According to this logic, when the trader's equity grows, he/she should withdraw funds :))) and deposit them again :))
Dezil: Everyone must find the answer for himself. I cannot make final conclusions on the basis of other people's plums, imho. But when I will withdraw my real, I will be closer to an answer.)
I can guess which answer you will be closer to.
Still on the strength of the logical assertion one might ponder, to paraphrase:
Not one of a thousand known attempts by mice to get cheese in a mousetrap has succeeded and always ended in the death of the mouse. Does it mean that the cheese in a mousetrap is relatively safe and the success of 1001 mice does not depend on the sad experience of their predecessors?
Still on the strength of the logical assertion one might ponder, to paraphrase:
Not one of a thousand known attempts by mice to get cheese in a mousetrap has succeeded and always ended in the death of the mouse. Does it mean that the cheese in a mousetrap is relatively safe and the success of 1001 mice does not depend on the sad experience of their predecessors?
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
+ ExpensiveBuyer - now in heavy drawdown - there's also a larger amount I've already poured into it.
It seems that here, too, we are witnessing the demise of the grand monster of the PAMM industry:
Or that it is really not possible to make money on forex in the long term.
Here, by the way, we as investors face the same problem as traders - investing at the highs and exiting at the lows, when it should be the other way round.
How to avoid this problem?
Apparently, here too, we are witnessing the demise of the grand monster of the PAMM industry:
Well-o-o-o-o-o... This is HZ, HZ.... :-)
Here, by the way, we as investors face the same problem as traders - investing at the highs and exiting at the lows, when it should be the other way round.
How do you avoid this problem?
Well, why not... :-)
I poured at the drawdown, because the roll was 1 time per day, so the money came right out of it.
So, everything is good here - buy lowers, sell tops, the system is counter-trend... :-)
If the trend has begun, it will continue ... :-)
1. Here, by the way, we as investors face the same problem as traders - investing at the highs and exiting at the lows, although it should be the other way round.
2. How do you avoid this problem?
1. After all, I didn't go out on the August snot because there was - A SYSTEM... :-) In twenty-four hours - shot and all is well... :-)
You do not have it now, that is all.
You have to have your own system of trading and investing.
Well, why not... :-)
I was filling up on the drawdown, because the roll was once a day, so the money came right out of the drawdown.
So, all is well here - we buy the bottoms, sell the tops - the system is a counter-trend system... :-)
If the trend has begun, it will continue ... :-)
Everyone must find the answer for himself. I cannot make final conclusions on the basis of other people's plums, imho. But when I will withdraw my real, I will be closer to an answer.)
I can guess which answer you will be closer to.
Still on the strength of the logical assertion one might ponder, to paraphrase:
Not one of a thousand known attempts by mice to get cheese in a mousetrap has succeeded and always ended in the death of the mouse. Does it mean that the cheese in a mousetrap is relatively safe and the success of 1001 mice does not depend on the sad experience of their predecessors?
I can guess which answer you will be closer to.
Still on the strength of the logical assertion one might ponder, to paraphrase:
Not one of a thousand known attempts by mice to get cheese in a mousetrap has succeeded and always ended in the death of the mouse. Does it mean that the cheese in a mousetrap is relatively safe and the success of 1001 mice does not depend on the sad experience of their predecessors?