Working with your hands is better - page 5
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Points only. There is profit. Percentage of capital is exactly the same as points.
Pips are not an indicator. Percentage of deposit growth per unit of time.
Pips are not an indicator. The percentage of deposit growth per unit of time.
Capital gains in pips?
You want it in a unit of time, you can count it that way.
For the investor who is a fool. Because investing in an individual trader is foolishness. For him I am not interested in what is important.
The trader sits in his job for a small percentage of the capital entrusted to him. He is not the object of investment but a trusted manager. Just like a driver who's been given a car to drive for a living.
Well, there's nothing to talk about.
...
I've been trying, for years, to write an algorithm. And I realized that it's impossible. So, it's better to do it by hand).
This is the reason for my indignation. Others can do it, but I cannot...
Is capital growing from profits in pips?
Different effect of 1 point with 0.1 lot and 10.0 lots.
Any trading strategy implies clear rules. Clear rules can always be programmed.
If a strategy cannot be programmed, then it is not a strategy, but banal gambling.
That is, if it is "hands only", then it is always roulette. Someone is sure to be lucky. Someone will be lucky for a very long time, perhaps until death. But it's still just roulette.
Absolutely right. Whether you trade with your hands or with an advisor is irrelevant. There has to be a clear strategy, full stop. And any clear strategy can be programmed.
Different effect of 1 point with 0.1 lot and 10.0 lots.
Are we talking about real?
Absolutely right. Whether you trade with your hands or with an advisor is irrelevant. There has to be a clear strategy, full stop. And any clear strategy can be programmed.
Not always a manual strategy is clear. Not every clear strategy can be programmed.
This is the reason for resentment. Others can do it and I can't - so it's impossible...
- >> well, that's fine.
>> Only time can tell if the EA is good or not. I stand by my opinion, the algorithm of the Expert Advisor, must have the function of autocorrection, which, in turn, also tends to get outdated, and therefore, too, must "rejuvenate".
Are we talking about the real thing?
Now comes the long, tedious and long-weary song about EMeMs. No one has it written on his forehead how much percentage of the deposit he opens, and that ten or five percent risk is not the benchmark norm.
- Well, that's great.
Only time can tell if an EA is good or not. I still stick to my opinion, the algorithm of the Expert Advisor should have the function of autocorrection, which in its turn also tends to become obsolete, so it needs to "rejuvenate".
In principle, a working algorithm from time to time should be adjusted to the changing market volatility, and the autocorrection algorithms are used by XEON and HIDDEN, and quite successfully.