You need to write an advisor. I have an idea. - page 5

New comment
 
mql4com писал(а) >>

mpeugep, post your test results here.

Symbol EURUSD (Euro vs US Dollar)
Period 1 Hour (H1) 2007.12.14 01:00 - 2009.01.15 18:59
Model By open prices (only for Expert Advisors with explicit bar opening control)
Parameters Limits=true; Distance=10; TP=85; SL=10; TralSL=87; Lots=0.1;
Bars in history 6830 Modelled ticks 13554 Simulation quality n/a
Chart mismatch errors 0
Initial deposit 1000000.00
Net profit 7419.22 Total profit 23261.46 Total loss -15842.24
Profitability 1.47 Expectation of winning 4.00
Absolute drawdown 126.80 Maximum drawdown 458.74 (0.05%) Relative drawdown 0.05% (458.74)
Total trades 1853 Short positions (% win) 940 (15.43%) Long positions (% win) 913 (14.24%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 275 (14.84%) Loss trades (% of all) 1578 (85.16%)
Largest profitable trade 85.84 losing transaction -13.44
Average profitable deal 84.59 losing deal -10.04
Maximum number continuous wins (profit) 2 (170.00) Continuous losses (loss) 37 (-370.58)
Maximum Continuous Profit (number of wins) 170.00 (2) Continuous loss (number of losses) -370.58 (37)
Average continuous winnings 1 Continuous loss 6


 
The picture is similar to this on the DAX, but as today's testing showed...it's not that simple...
 
mpeugep писал(а) >>
The picture is similar to this one on the DAX, but as today's testing showed...it's not that simple...

There are no errors in the logbook. I'll have another look in the visualisation to see what's going on.

 
Reshetov >> :

There are no errors in the logbook. I'll have another look in the visualisation to see what's going on.

I put exp_Higt-Low.mq4 on my demo, which is on the 3rd page of my post. It even gives 418 in the tester...

 
 
It's unlikely that the DC will put up with it)
 
mpeugep писал(а) >>
This is unlikely to be tolerated by DC)

Why so sceptical? It will hold. There are only two orders at a time and no more than two orders in 1 hour. Another thing is that the EA does not take into account delays after the orders, and there is no accounting for server responses. In other words, this code is just a tester for now.

Little more tweaking and it will be possible to test it in conditions close to real battle ones.

 
mpeugep >> :

I put exp_Higt-Low.mq4 on my demo, which is shown on page 3 of my post. It gives 418 even in the tester.

Why do I need an Expert Advisor, which is sending errors to the magazine? I'm sure that there is no point in testing a known for-profit Expert Advisor.


That's why I'm testing the right Expert Advisor. >> You're testing the wrong one.

 

DAX test results for December-January 15 min.

 
Reshetov >> :

Why so sceptical? It will hold. There are only two orders at a time and no more than two orders in 1 hour. Another thing is that the EA does not take into account delays after orders, and there is no server response accounting. In other words, this code is just a tester for now.

Some more modifications and it will be possible to test it in conditions close to real battle ones.

Exactly.

Noticed when testing with stopwatches that errors of sending order 130...and modifications too...

1234567
New comment
Reason: