Breaking through the morning flat - page 9

 

YuraZ

That chart you cited on 25.01, is that the result of the system you said? I.e. a synchronous breakdown of the euro and the chiff, and that's it?

 
Burgunsky >> :

YuraZ

That chart you cited on 25.01, is that the result of working with the system you mentioned? I.e. synchronous breakdown of euro and chif and that's it?

Not really - it's a component of the system

one of the patterns.

---

The system is quite difficult to automate

and yet it's been done.


I'll try - I'll risk showing a demo where the latest release works

of the multicurrency on the breakdown!

In short: the system does the inputs, the targets, sometimes I just adjust them slightly.

Sometimes I make exits together with it, my task is to help it cope - where automation fails.

i think this is the right approach.

the system has 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 orders!

---


---

the main emphasis is placed on the fact that the market is a very volatile substance

try to trade within the same day - except for situations when the order takes a good profit



Deposit/Withdrawal:

10 000.00

Credit Facility:

0.00


Closed Trade P/L:

2 696.08

Floating P/L:

0.00

Margin:

0.00

Balance:

12 696.08

Equity:

12 696.08

Free Margin:

12 696.08


Details:


Gross Profit:

3 038.03

Gross Loss:

341.95

Total Net Profit:

2 696.08

Profit Factor:

8.88

Expected Payoff:

57.36


Absolute Drawdown:

0.00

Maximal Drawdown:

252.15 (2.10%)

Relative Drawdown:

2.10% (252.15)


Total Trades:

47

Short Positions (won %):

24 (83.33%)

Long Positions (won %):

23 (86.96%)

Profit Trades (% of total):

40 (85.11%)

Loss trades (% of total):

7 (14.89%)

Largest

profit trade:

279.28

loss trade:

-87.19

Average

profit trade:

75.95

loss trade:

-48.85

Maximum

($):

17 (1 403.57)

consecutive losses ($):

3 (-252.15)

Maximal

consecutive profit (count):

1 403.57 (17)

consecutive loss (count):

-252.15 (3)

Average

consecutive wins:

8

consecutive losses:

2



Traded pairs

xxxusd usdxxx

---------------------

eurusd usdcad

gbpusd usdchf

audusd usdjpy- it is not analyzed in the system as an allied pair

nzdusd

---------------------

 
YuraZ >> :

... I dare to show a demo where the latest release works

May I ask how long these 47 trades take and what is the complexity of automation?

Are the stop-loss orders thrown to a pair from the regular Fibo grid or the "channel widening" trigger linked to the time of day?

And are there any Limit orders, i.e. 4 max orders can be opened in both directions?

 
pisara >> :

Can I ask how long these 47 trades take and what is the difficulty of automating them?

Are the stop pauses just thrown on the pair with the equal Fibo grid, or is the channel expansion trigger tied to the time of day?

And are there also limit orders, i.e. can a maximum of 4 orders be opened in both directions?

Not necessarily 4 orders may be 2 or 1

--

2 weeks is not a long time

--

the orders are placed depending on the width of the grid, i.e. in strict places, i.e. not just blind and if you've seen the screenshots

you'll notice where the system takes the take and the entries

I wouldn't say it's stupid.

it's not time based - except that the breakthrough is fixed after a certain amount of time.

there's a breakdown lock, and that's where the dance goes.

--

it's hard to fix a breakthrough by software, to count the targets

If you've seen the screens, you've seen where the system takes takeaways and entries go to the bottom.









 
YuraZ >> :
there is no time constraint - only a breakthrough is fixed after a certain time

there's a breakdown fixation, that's where the dance goes

Thanks for the screenshots, it's clearer now.

I did not understand your script, but deals at +161 are seen on 3 of 4 screens, does it mean that somewhere at 6:00 terminal put a stop order (or market order) for breakdown of channel level 0:00-6:00?

Also, it seems like the line of 4 limits is only put after the breakdown of the 161 level, where the take of the first order on the broken channel is immediately taken.

Further, the order opened at 138 waits for the takeout at 261. The lot in the line of limit levels decreases from 0.4 to 0.1 with each increase of the opening level (more risk of under-betting to the take line)?

The 4 limiters on March 10 on EU with a pronounced decline (Fig. 3) looks a little less fun - just like the famous downward averaging. Wouldn't it be better to put stop orders to go up only after the change of the direction, one by one, and not all 4 at once?

Also, the supersensitivity of the clippers trimmed to +49 positions is interesting. Maybe a trawl would be better?

 
pisara >> :

Thanks for the screenshots, it's clearer now.

Didn't deal with your script, but I can see +161 on 3 of 4 screens, does it mean that somewhere at 6:00 terminal we put a stop order (or market order) to break the channel level 0:00-6:00?

Also, it seems like the line of 4 Limits is only placed after the breakdown of the 161 level, where the first order is immediately taken by the breakdown of the channel.

Further, the order opened at 138 waits for the takeout at 261. The lot in the line of limit levels decreases from 0.4 to 0.1 with each increase of the opening level (more risk of under-betting to the take line)?

It's not much fun looking at the March 10 Limit Line of 4 on EU with a pronounced decline (Fig. 3) - just like the famous downward averaging. Wouldn't it be more correct to place stop orders to go up only after a change of direction, one at a time, rather than all 4 at once?

Also, the oversensitivity of the clippers trimmed to +49 positions is interesting. Maybe a trawl would be better?

the trawl is no better as the targets are counted by the fibo

Breakeven is more reliable, then just wait for the target


time after which the counting starts 5-8 hours

then wait for a breakout and only after the breakout is confirmed do we place the stop orders by the fibo with targets according to the fibo

--

the situation on the 18th figure the system did everything well and beautifully


in the morning before work I postponed the automatic buy order for the pound

buy priority on the euro buy priority on the audi and the new zealand

(I try not to trade against the trend)

i got the same result on the real account, i just took a profit on audi and NZ

i got this semiautomate there as well

i got the profit on the whole virgin candlestick


the pound was sold on the 17th and fixed on the 18th, according to the calculated target.

On the 18th also there was a sale after breakdown

chiF was sold after the breakdown, fiscally corrected 261 fibo profit

Summary:
Deposit/Withdrawal: 10 000.00 Credit Facility: 0.00
Closed Trade P/L: 3 217.42 Floating P/L: 0.00 Margin: 0.00
Balance: 13 217.42 Equity: 13 217.42 Free Margin: 13 217.42

Details:

Gross Profit: 3 898.90 Gross Loss: 681.48 Total Net Profit: 3 217.42
Profit Factor: 5.72 Expected Payoff: 47.31
Absolute Drawdown: 0.00 Maximal Drawdown: 252.15 (2.10%) Relative Drawdown: 2.10% (252.15)

Total Trades: 68 Short Positions (won %): 31 (83.87%) Long Positions (won %): 37 (78.38%)
Profit Trades (% of total): 55 (80.88%) Loss trades (% of total): 13 (19.12%)
Largest profit trade: 335.52 loss trade: -99.19
Average profit trade: 70.89 loss trade: -52.42
Maximum ($): 17 (1 403.57) consecutive losses ($): 3 (-252.15)
Maximal consecutive profit (count): 1 403.57 (17) consecutive loss (count): -252.15 (3)
Average consecutive wins: 7 consecutive losses: 2


--


 
YuraZ >> :

I chose 5-8 hours after the gaps

then wait for breakdown and only after breakdown is secured, place a Fibo pending order with Fibo targets

--

in the morning before work I put the automatic for sell priority to the pound

buy priority for the euro buy priority for the euro and new zealand

( I try not to trade against the trend )

And the breakdown fixing is when the stop order takes a takeoff at Fibo 161, or something else?

The pound was sold on the 17th not in the morning flat system... - by hand or by the Expert Advisor?

I don't get it, is the opening side priority function the only thing taken away from the EA (and invested in its parameters)?

I.e. the most vulnerable one is to determine the direction, not the target value? Because there are such spikes these days, by 200-300 points with gaps...

Kiwi without exposed tees is already a departure from the grid for the long haul...

 
pisara >> :

Is the breakdown fixing when the stop order takes the take on Fibo 161, or something else?

The pound was sold on the 17th, not in the morning flat system... - by hand or by the Expert Advisor?

I don't get it, is the opening side priority function the only thing taken away from the EA (and invested in its parameters)?

I.e. the most vulnerable one is to determine the direction, not the target value? Because there are such spikes these days, by 200-300 points with gaps...

Kiwi without set takeoffs is a long position away from the grid...

it's a hold placed in the morning during the breakdown it wasn't hands it just lived through the night and worked.

( but there are also manual gaps ) with the 661pipe after the Swiss bank`s rip-offs.

Yeah ... I should have got out on Friday 20th :-)

but more often manual exits move takei stops and orders

i don't believe in graals and i think trading with an EA is much more efficient

than purely manual or purely automatic

I set priorities for the trend following the state of candlesticks on d1 and set variables accordingly in the settings

the programme has been deprived of the trend definition its task is to enter by the situation and calculate the target

as you can see in the linked images, the robot is good at identifying intraday targets

the system trades very well along the trend

---

here are the details of how the machine and my hands work

http://forum.masterforex-v.org/index.php?s...st&p=399083

 

The slack worked out



 


trading on all majors since 2009.03.09

for each pair you can see pips profit