[Archive c 17.03.2008] Humour [Archive to 28.04.2012] - page 85

[[Deleted]]

Yeah, that's a funny trick.)

[михаил потапыч]

Mischek >>:
с толщиной теоретически можно решить т.к. в студии все "свои"
одну из монет мы видим только сверху а она чуть больше в диаметре и может быть выполнена в виде типа сковородки (перевернутой)
тогда при сложении толщина не изменится
но вот практически.....

Oh, for sure.
Watch the very first episode
where he supposedly takes one of the three coins from someone else's palm

[Павел Владимирович]

Dug up from the imperial days. Seems relevant to me.
What's the difference between trouble and disaster?
- Suppose a goat was walking on a bridge, fell through and drowned. That's
a disaster, but not a catastrophe. Now let's say that a plane with members of the government on board
a plane with members of the government on board. That is a disaster, but not a disaster.

[Sceptic Philozoff]

It's certainly not humour. But the disaster is ridiculous. The decision must have been made by himself. He did not like Minsk or Moscow. So he paid the price and killed half of the top brass.
But now he is a hero in Poland, and tied to Katyn forever.

[Петр]

In Russia, the President, the Prime Minister and the Patriarch should have special lights on their cars, says Moscow Mayor Yury Luzhkov. "The rest should have their blinkers taken away as a matter of principle," the mayor said on the TVC channel. <br / translate="no">

Well... in general, I agree. But why do the patriarch need it? Where (to whom!) is he in such a hurry???))

[richie]

That's not all. We're waiting for the sequel. Who's next.

[михаил потапыч]

Mathemat >>:
Это, конечно, не юмор. Но катастрофа нелепая. Наверняка решение принимал Сам.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lICb8p9SvvM&feature=player_embedded

[SAMER]

[Sceptic Philozoff]

Mischek >>: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lICb8p9SvvM&feature=player_embedded

Yes, such problems are possible, of course.

[михаил потапыч]

Matmech recalls 500,000 of its graduates. Reason for the recall: in Fichtenholz Volume II on page 187 in formula XVIII.56 the normalising operator is missing.