[Archive c 17.03.2008] Humour [Archive to 28.04.2012] - page 431 1...424425426427428429430431432433434435436437438...847 New comment Alexandr Bryzgalov 2010.10.22 16:33 #4301 Mischek: Are you going to lose another beer ? I mean bet ? Let's get started.) Victor Nikolaev 2010.10.22 16:35 #4302 sanyooooook: Let's get started.) And let Granit be the referee. Alexandr Bryzgalov 2010.10.22 16:40 #4303 Double the stakes )))) михаил потапыч 2010.10.22 16:40 #4304 sanyooooook: Let's get started.) Same thing so far. I show you a picture, you look at it and study it. Then I show you two fragments and say, for example, that they are the same colour. You spend a minute, without using software, to avoid the argument or join it if you think the colours are different. If you withdraw, you owe me 2 beers. If you join, the total is the proof of my point of view that I gave you later. Methods of identifying a Adaptive lookback indicators FOREX - Trends, Forecasts михаил потапыч 2010.10.22 16:41 #4305 sanyooooook: Double the stakes )))) no martin михаил потапыч 2010.10.22 16:42 #4306 Alexandr Bryzgalov 2010.10.22 16:42 #4307 Mischek: what should be done? михаил потапыч 2010.10.22 16:44 #4308 So I believe that the squares marked with arrows are the same colour Alexandr Bryzgalov 2010.10.22 16:45 #4309 Mischek: It's the same thing so far. I show you a picture, you look at it and study it. Then I show you two fragments and say, for example, that they are the same colour. You take a minute, you don't use the software. You back out of the argument or you join in. if you think the colours of the pieces are different. If If you back out, you owe me two beers. if you do, then the bottom line is the evidence I gave you later to prove my point. You're sneaky, if I deflect, do I lose immediately? Alexander Sevastyanov 2010.10.22 16:45 #4310 sanyooooook: what should be done? Assemble the cube in 5 minutes ))) 1...424425426427428429430431432433434435436437438...847 New comment
Are you going to lose another beer ? I mean bet ?
Let's get started.)
And let Granit be the referee.
Double the stakes ))))
Let's get started.)
Same thing so far.
I show you a picture, you look at it and study it.
Then I show you two fragments and say, for example, that they are the same colour.
You spend a minute, without using software, to avoid the argument or join it if you think the colours are different.
If you withdraw, you owe me 2 beers. If you join, the total is the proof of my point of view that I gave you later.
Double the stakes ))))
no martin
So I believe that the squares marked with arrows are the same colour
It's the same thing so far.
I show you a picture, you look at it and study it.
Then I show you two fragments and say, for example, that they are the same colour.
You take a minute, you don't use the software. You back out of the argument or you join in. if you think the colours of the pieces are different.
If If you back out, you owe me two beers. if you do, then the bottom line is the evidence I gave you later to prove my point.
what should be done?