
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
And all the rest (filters + EA) is already a matter of technique. In principle I don't mind to help.
there are at least 5 options
Let's consider everything step by step and check it out. I just see in this idea a great sense as even just spectroanalysis of nonstationary series in areas close (far conditionally) to the stationary one gives results.... I backtest and monitor 2 systems in real life
P.S. To begin, for example, with the simplest question: how it is possible to establish stationarity in the weak sense for some series, which is, say, a statistical constant with m.o. = 0 (sorry for poor terminology, as I am not an expert on statistics)?
It is obvious (to me) that m.o. alone is not enough to establish its stationarity in the weak sense. It is also necessary to know its s.r.o. It means that if the s.r.o. of the real series is equal to 0.5, the criterion which is based on the s.r.o. must not exceed 0.03, will reject stationarity of the studied series with a certain high probability, right? mql4-coding, help, eh?
The main question is the criterion of stationarity of the series. The main question is the criterion of stationarity of a series. How many times I tried it on the forums, including mechmatyans, - the answer was not heard. I got an impression that such a criterion, which is generally accepted, allegedly does not exist. I am ready to listen to variants as I do not believe that there is no such a criterion. The topic is too hot.
P.S. To begin, for example, with the simplest question: how it is possible to establish stationarity in the weak sense for some series, which is, say, a statistical constant with m.o. = 0 (sorry for poor terminology, as I am not an expert on statistics)?
It is obvious (to me) that m.o. alone is not enough to establish its stationarity in the weak sense. It is also necessary to know its s.r.o. It means that if the s.r.o. of the real series is equal to 0.5, the criterion which is based on the s.r.o. must not exceed 0.03, will reject stationarity of the studied series with a certain high probability, right? mql4-coding, help, eh?
In my opinion, the decreasing sequence of the mean (sko) is (may be) an estimate of the predictability of the series. The decreasing sequence of the variance of the mean. That is, the sko must be decreasing. For example if we consider a linear regression channel then the sko will decrease in it. I can also think and somehow insert Hearst criterion into series estimation (I'm not sure). I honestly didn't start out from definition of stationarity of series but considered it non-stationary at first :-) and was searching for correct ways of its analysis. But perhaps you are right and I should begin
I will think about it tomorrow and formulate stationarity criteria with formulas.
I don't understand what the problem is actually? There is a clear mathematical concept of a stationary random process - it is a random process whose probabilistic characteristics do not change over time.
Since in this case we are considering a time series, which is the realization of some random process, the notion of a stationary time series is quite obvious from the definition of a stationary random process.
Hence the conclusion that you're a bit mistaken. m.o. may not be equal to 0, and s.k.o. may be whatever. As long as these quantities are constant, the random process is stationary.
establish stationarity in the weak sense for some series,
which is, say, a statistical constant with m.o. = 0 (sorry for the
poor terminology, as I am not a statistician)?
I don't understand what the actual problem is? There is a clear mathematical concept of a stationary random process - it is a random process whose probability characteristics do not change over time.
Since in this case we are considering a time series, which is the realization of some random process, the notion of a stationary time series is quite obvious from the definition of a stationary random process.
Hence the conclusion that you're a bit mistaken. m.o. may not be equal to 0, and s.k.o. may be whatever. As long as these quantities are constant, the random process is stationary.
yes
A random process (SP) with finite variance is called stationary in the broad sense if, its OLS (m.o.) and covariance function are invariant with respect to time shift, i.e. the OLS is constant (not time dependent) and the covariance function depends only on the difference of arguments t 2- t 1.
In some cases (which seems to me to be our forex case) a non-stationary process can be transformed into a stationary one.
Obviously it reduces to stationary. Most probably we are dealing with so-called periodically stationary or cyclostationary process.
Mathemat I gave you Tikhonov, it seems to have it all