Stochastic resonance - page 13
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
to AAB.
That's good, if it's pointless to run stats on this task, it still comes in handy, good tool. I hope the traffic is not limited. :о)
to Candid
It can be done, but it's quite complicated and tedious and not parameters then (to calculate them you first need to find a channel and it makes no sense to search for it twice) but number of iterations. Anyway, let's figure it out.
It was counted simply: I found lateral channels (which is flat), determined its length, calculated LR coefficients and compared them to each other. The coefficient b in LR sits here y=a+b*x, roughly speaking - slope angle of the channel (if converted (180/pi)*arctangens(b)). I don't know how to interpret it, but it seems to be more chaotic behavior of this angle for channels up to 200 counts (approximately) than for senior guys and they have some detectable zones and structures. This conclusion is written with a pitchfork in water, but I'll leave the parameter, maybe it will be useful in comparison with other characteristics.
Very vain, and if not a trade secret, what are you going to calculate?
Yes was calculated simply: found lateral channels (which flute), determined its length, calculated LR coefficients and compared them with each other. The coefficient b in LR sits here y=a+b*x, roughly speaking - channel slope angle (if we convert (180/pi)*arctangens(b)). I don't know how to interpret it, but it seems to be more chaotic behavior of this angle for channels up to 200 counts (approximately) than for senior guys and they have some detectable zones and structures. This conclusion is written with a pitchfork in water, but I will leave the parameter, maybe it will be useful in comparison with other characteristics.
I cannot find out how the channel length was determined. I think it was not determined as I had written earlier but the channel was just considered as lasting to the end.
In theory, the structure in the image must somehow reflect the structure of this part of the chart but it turns out it consists of two sharply different parts
Very in vain, and if it is not a commercial secret, what are you going to count?
It seems to gleam how one could try to calculate steady states such as those drawn above, in the post of 16.10.2007 22:43 . But so far I don't quite understand whether it would or wouldn't work.
Mathcad 14.0.0.163 put it up to calculate....
to Candid
As soon as the criterion for a channel was triggered, its length was immediately fixed (the graphs show it in relation to other indicators). I filtered only lateral channels by criterion "b" coefficient, which should be about zero +-5 degrees (besides, I changed a little bit the channel search algorithm :o)
Something like that but only all found side channels are compared instead of "going one after another". The "b" coefficient could just theoretically be used as an "annoying" signal (it must "fluctuate" somehow) in a stochastic resonance model, but that's just a thought and a lot about it later. Anyway, we'll figure it out :o)
So I wonder what the idea is. OK, I won't pry any more secrets. :о))
to AAB
I think I will get clarity within a week, maybe later: code in MathCAD still needs to be compiled completely, tested, error checked and run with test data (it will be disappointing, if after n hours, no, n is not enough, after m hours of computation I will find out that there is a mistake). Besides, for me this work is optional and I can't devote all my free time to it, although I feel that something must be. In any case, the research tool you put is a great thing and you didn't download it for nothing anyway. It's advisable to master it: www.exponenta.ru (nothing wrong there, it's exceptionally simple, if you know the maths)
if after n hours, no, n is small, after m hours of calculation it will turn out that an error has crept in
I'll attach as I did the book by Ivanov I. P. "What is stochastic resonance? "Maybe someone will be interested in it.
It mentions double stochastic resonance in popular form, with pictures and in the end of the book, one of them has not been dealt with yet, and here it is... I'm crying.
Curious, I'll have a look, thanks for the BP.
if after n hours, no, n is not enough, after m hours of calculation it will appear that an error has crept in
By the way, there are several packages out there that support BP prediction functions, see what you like.
So I wondered what the idea was. OK, I won't pry any more secrets. :о))
No, I wouldn't mind my own, but this google is such a codger :)
if after n hours, no, n is small, after m hours of calculation it will turn out that an error has crept in
I'll attach as I did the book by Ivanov I. P. "What is stochastic resonance? "Maybe someone will be interested in it.
It mentions double stochastic resonance in popular form, with pictures and in the end of the book, one of them has not been dealt with yet, and here it is... I'm crying.
Curious, I'll have a look, thanks for the BP.
Interesting book.
to Candid
I've got it! If you use the mail: grasn(barring)rambler[.]ru :o)))
to AAB
With it I started my acquaintance with stochastic resonance from the link from Wikipedia: "Stochastic Resonance - from archives of "Scientific Laboratory of Schoolchildren". Immediately I decided that this was what I needed :o)
I've got it! How about using the post office :o)))