Once again, it's about the eternal: trend/flat. - page 5
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
"Strong movement" A common forum expression. It amuses me in another way, how some fellow players look for mathematical precision in the markets.
The market is predictable, but talking about mathematical accuracy always brings a smile to my face.
"Strong movement" A common forum expression. It amuses me in another way, how some fellow players look for mathematical precision in the markets.
The market is predictable, but talking about mathematical accuracy always brings a smile to my face.
is the profit or loss in the terminal mathematically accurate or not? Or does the terminal say "You have approximately made a profit of about $1"?
Vladimir, that's not what I'd say about accuracy. :) There is no absolute accuracy, but there is a calculated "nominal size" and "tolerance field". :)
Exactly. It's good that there are people who understand, because they want accuracy to 8 digits))), the minimum coin is still 1 cent and the leverage to take it away.
No, no, the minimum coin is not 1 cent, but somewhere around 1 cent, certainly not $100, but not a negative value either, so maybe 1 cent is exactly the estimate that could quite possibly be accepted at least for today, well certainly not for a week.
In short, ". it's indisputable" (c).
No, no, the minimum coin is not 1 cent, but somewhere around 1 cent, certainly not $100, but not a negative value either, so maybe 1 cent is exactly the estimate that could quite possibly be accepted at least for today, well certainly not for a week.
In short, ". it's indisputable" (c).
Undeniably spelled with two s's. You have respected porn((((.
I have my own view of wave theory, and it differs from the classical one.
Probably easier to explain in a picture.
V2-N2 price movement and the green straight line is a flat. On higher TF these processes may not be distinguishable.
The picture does not "open" it is not clear what TF, V2-N2 impulse that was almost immediately "cancelled" by the counter-movement (if the market has a good buying volume, it is interested in selling at a higher price and buying at a lower price).After the break and downwards movement again (probably they have grabbed the orders and took them downwards - they are clearing the way) - variations on the theme of "gut feeling" )))) .
At lower prices where the sideways movement is 5-6 pips long, it may be advisable to "bind" to the level.
And the word "respected" is marked with commas on both sides - so what?
Your arrogance just comes through the cracks.
What a mess you have made of this thread(((.
It's an interesting topic, but do you have anything to say on the current one? Or just blah-blah? If you have nothing to say, you'd better shut up. No one will discuss anything in this atmosphere. This is unfortunate(((.
Your arrogance just comes through the cracks.
What a mess you've made of this thread(((.
It's an interesting topic, but do you have anything to say on the current one? Or just blah-blah? If you have nothing to say, you'd better shut up. No one will discuss anything in this atmosphere. It's unfortunate.(((
Well, don't grieve....
On the merits of the topic - the problem of defining t/f on history is not a problem at all.
It is the problem of predicting t/f for the future.
And if you have solved the problem of predicting - there is no special problem in the TS.
P.S. In short, "...it's a no-brainer" (c).