Stable MTS - page 16

[[Deleted]]

azfaraon:
Reduce the lot by a factor of 4 and you get what you need...

You know it won't work for every strategy. If the mathematical expectation is negative, then reducing the lot only prolongs the agony.

[TheXpert]

azfaraon:

Why would I do that?) We're just discussing the forum.

Am I giving you a hard time? I need you too much. I wasn't writing to you.

[[Deleted]]

Oleg Shenker:
You know that this will not work for every strategy. If the mat expectation is negative, reducing the lot only prolongs the agony.

I wasn't talking about every strategy...

[[Deleted]]

azfaraon:
And where did you see 40% of profitable deals there?

I wasn't talking about there, I was talking about the hypothetical mid-tier that my colleague started with, who has the number of profitable trades at the average market level.

[[Deleted]]

Комбинатор:
Am I boring you? I need you badly. I wasn't writing to you.

You said you could do the same. That's why I wrote, why should I do it. You didn't quite get it. Sorry if I offended you.

[[Deleted]]

Oleg Shenker:
I wasn't talking about there, I was talking about the hypothetical average guy that my colleague started with, whose number of profitable trades is at the market average level.

Well, you just have to throw it away))

[[Deleted]]

azfaraon:
I wasn't talking about every...

I have nothing against your strategy. Although, I would like to see the timing of recovery from DD and the stability of the monthly volatility of profits.

[TheXpert]

Oleg Shenker:
Why not?

Because a reliability of 16 tester percent is not just unreliable, it is almost a guarantee of a drain.

[[Deleted]]

Oleg Shenker:
I have nothing against your strategy. Although, I would like to see the timing of recovery after DD and the stability of the monthly volatility of profit.

I just turn it on the server at the beginning of the year and forget and only look at 25-26 December .

[[Deleted]]

Oleg Shenker:

You are right, people don't know what they want, I should know what they want. Well, I know that they want 10-13% p.a. and a drawdown of no more than 10% with recovery within 2-3 months. At those rates, people will fall in line.

That is not the question. It's not the investors or their willingness. The question is what can realistically be expected from the trading algorithm. How do I know, maybe it's just another myth of marketers who (as a respected colleague here taught me) want to "make money" by luring investors into perilous projects, in other words by trying to sell them another pipe dream in the form of trading robots.

With reinvestment or not? That is, for 10 years 100-130% in profit or reinvestment after a certain amount earned?