Global recession over the end of Moore's Law - page 11

New comment
 
СанСаныч Фоменко:

I used to have a computing device called an 'arithmometer': you turn the knob and the numbers pop out. That was 50 years ago. In fact, nothing qualitative has happened in the world of computing since then, only quantitatively: the knob is spinning faster.

And yet the future of computing is just above our noses.

Uh-huh. I agree.
 
Vasiliy Sokolov:
The euphoria about neural algorithms was over back in the 80s. A lot of hope was pinned on them. Many tasks were successfully solved with them. But on the whole, the idea failed, artificial intelligence was never created.
we didn't grow up with artificial intelligence. Neural networks themselves have nothing to do with it.
 
Vasiliy Sokolov:
The euphoria about neural algorithms went away back in the 80s.
Then again, it's gone. Now there is a surge of interest in neural networks. The msqrd is a clear proof of that
 
Vasiliy Sokolov:
The euphoria about neural algorithms was already in the 80's. Much hope was pinned on them. Many problems were successfully solved with their help. But on the whole, the idea failed, artificial intelligence was never created.

But there are programs that beat world chess champions. Of course, these are highly specialised programmes, but if at the same high level a set of programmes could be developed that could perform a wide range of different aspects of human mental activity, then it would really be artificial intelligence. And if such a chess program has been created, I don't see any fundamental limitations that would prevent this task from being solved.

The most difficult thing, of course, is to teach the programme to come up with something new (to invent). But not everyone can become an inventor either. Although there are algorithms in inventing too, if you think about it.

 
khorosh:
But there are programs that beat world chess champions. Of course, these are highly specialised programmes, but if at the same high level a set of programmes could be developed that could perform a wide range of different aspects of human mental activity, then it would really be artificial intelligence. And if such a chess programme has been created, I don't see any fundamental limitations that would prevent this task from being solved.
Chess, they have found something to surprise you with. It's not the computer that beats the champions, it's the champions that lose to the computer. The computer has all the moves calculated in advance, and if you make even one wrong move, you lose.
 
Alexey Busygin:
Chess, they've got something to surprise you. It is not the computer that beats the champions, it is the champions who lose to the computer. The computer has all the moves calculated in advance, if you make even one wrong move, you lose. In this game, the one who moves first wins.
He who makes the right move wins.
 
Alexandr Saprykin:
He who walks correctly wins.
Well, I wrote about that too, only in an explanatory form. The computer can't go wrong, it's all worked out by logic.
 
Alexey Busygin:
Chess, they've got something to surprise you. It is not the computer that beats the champions, it is the champions who lose to the computer. The computer has all the moves calculated in advance, if you make even one wrong move, you lose. In this game, the one who moves first wins.
Let's play, you play white. See if you can beat me.)
 
khorosh:
Let's play, you play white. Let's see if you beat me.)
I'm going to run it now, and we'll play.))
 
khorosh:
Let's play, you play white. See if you beat me.)
If the computer plays instead of me, you lose.
1...45678910111213141516171819
New comment
Reason: