Total wiretapping is being introduced - page 21

New comment
 
Yuriy Zaytsev:

He who is not a liberal in his youth! - is a scoundrel!

and he who is not a conservative in his old age is a fool.

The point is not to have one thing, but to change constantly here and there.
 
Dmitry Fedoseev:
The point is not to have one thing, but to constantly change back and forth.

If you change back and forth, it'll be rubbish.

You need a balanced approach.

 
Yuriy Zaytsev:

what is the point?

In china, they know who's next long before that. They have firebombs, they do not care about the outside world and its values.

But everyone trades with them and does not make a fuss.

And they are developing economically, they have production facilities, industry is growing, Chinese goods are not the worst.

They are doing pretty good ... maybe someone wants to give them an orange and pink tulip banana revolution?

Yet the chinese somehow use google, facebook, twitter and other services of the decaying west.
 

We need to move forward and develop, not look back at those who are worse off.

Especially since China is self-sufficient, they have been stewing in their own juices for a long time, they are used to it. And we have already tasted freedom, and going back to isolation would be death.

 
Alexey Navoykov:

You can also think of North Korea, what is the point of all this? We need to move forward, develop, not look back at those who have it worse.

Unfortunately, the establishment in power thinks otherwise.
 

25 pages with a persistent whiff of schizophrenia.

All the rebuttalists have not read the law, but have their own, exceptionally libertine opinions.

 
СанСаныч Фоменко:

25 pages with a persistent whiff of schizophrenia.

All the rebuttalists have not read the law, but have their own, exceptionally libertine opinions.

Have you read it? Or do you get your information from this video? (It's all schizophrenia and paranoia there).
 
СанСаныч Фоменко:

25 pages with a persistent whiff of schizophrenia.

All the rebuttalists have not read the law, but have their own, exceptionally libertine opinions.

We can start forming a citation book:

"If you want a powerful army..."

"A citizen's life is sacred, but the highest value is the state."

 
СанСаныч Фоменко:

25 pages with a persistent whiff of schizophrenia.

All the rebuttalists have not read the law, but have their own, exceptionally libertine opinions.

A typical example of propaganda to justify tightening the screws

 

Suffice it to read the work of this Nikolai Starikov in the genre of paranoid pseudoscientific fiction: http://lit.md/nstarikov.htm

Here's an example:

Crisis. How it's done (2009)

  • What has been done by the US authorities to make the crisis necessarily happen?
  • Why are dollars issued not by the government, but by a private shop called the Fed?
  • How did the West collapse the price of oil?
  • What is democracy and why will it never win around the world?
  • Why did Ukraine shut off the gas valve to Russian gas?
  • Who really orchestrated the Holodomor in the USSR and why?
  • Who was Faina carrying her tanks to?
  • Why does the US political system resemble a broken roulette?
  • What does the assassination of President John F. Kennedy have to do with today's crisis?
  • Why is petrol more expensive in Russia than in America?
1...141516171819202122232425262728...60
New comment
Reason: