FOREX - Trends, forecasts and implications 2016 - page 848
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Rena, as soon as you come to your senses .
I had the net downloaded, but never tried it out.
From the price to both sides of the order with stops (worked, according to my words, on a four with the euro).
There on one side at high valuations wrong price is stopped, pending orders may be removed
and reset the net. It has been shown many times, but not quite what we needed.
Do you understand what I mean?
I can see clearly...
see clearly...
And what do you see clearly there?))
Everyone is sitting in profits on it and no one needs to go anywhere)
What's there to code? It's 1.18 in Russian!!! I'll be even more precise: 1.181. In terms of time, I don't know (there are still many levels on the way) But certainly not through parity!!! Print it out and stick it on the wall In the next six months we may see.
And what do you see clearly there?))
Everyone is sitting in profits on it and no one needs to go anywhere)
I'm asking him out of normal references (no tweaks).
The sale was at my peak and when I asked everyone was out of interest....
I'm still on a roll with the nets.)
What's wrong with nets?
He's got himself a full bag of pounds and it's all bad ay yay yay yay ......)
1,2 - on smaller timeframes - also available! Sergey, are you deliberately ignoring my questions? )))
What's wrong with nets?
He's got himself a full handful of the pound and it's all bad ay yay yay yay ......)
Well, you need not two orders, but 20 and the levels from and to where they are also needed, I showed you where they are.
Margin should be estimated and the risk should also be calculated...
And orders are not the same...
There are no stops, only take or out - if the price reaches the levels.)
That's about it...
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/71038/page839#comment_2784936
there's definitely a question on one of the pages I asked you about... if it's that important, I'll go look for it now.