Why do 95% of traders lose? - page 8
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
And count how much time you spend on posts ) you'll want to write shorter.
Alternatively, start a tweet, 140 characters per thought -- it's disciplined, I'd love to subscribe.
Thank you, though.)
This is relevant and very useful advice for me. Thank you! /*I'm already there, just haven't posted much, I'll try to practice there.
I'll write to you in a minute.
Wrote.
А вы посчитайте, сколько времени на посты тратите ) сразу захочется писать короче.
Great)) got it - was just thinking about it on the way home from work
They say that 95% of traders lose money in the long run ( i.e. they can win for a month, half a year, a year, but after a while they still lose their money)
Greetings, the numbers may be different. However, I have good reason, to say that we are actually talking about 100%.My conclusions are based on... Let's call it the "laws" or "rules" that you, as an ordinary trader - abide by, whether you want to or not. Let's go in order:
1. Technical Analysis. What is a price chart? It is the transfer of a huge volume of situations, probabilities, speculations and other information affecting the price, into what? Right, in a flat two-dimensional graph. And now ask yourself, is it possible to objectively assess the multidimensional nature of what is happening, in two dimensions? Never.
2. Fundamental analysis. Same eggs, only in profile. Let's ask ourselves the question, do we get the news in a timely manner? Does everything "tell" us? Is the information correct? What would work on the foundation (IMHO) you need a VERY hairy hand on the board of directors, preferably the world's leading bank. If you don't have such a paw, you will always fall behind and usually miss out.
3. The whole game is concentrated in the hands of the leading banks, and corporations they have data direction, volume, degree of growth, etc. do you think banks are willing, to give you money for nothing? The answer is obvious.
To sum up my post: The average trader always works on someone else's field, by someone else's rules, which means that in the end it will always be a loser.
I am honoured.
Greetings! The figures may vary. However, I have good reason to say that it is in fact 100%.My conclusions are based on... let's call it "the laws" or "the rules" that you, as an ordinary trader, abide by, whether you like it or not. Let's go in order:
1. Technical Analysis. What is a price chart? It is the transfer of a huge amount of information, situations, probabilities, speculations and other information affecting the price, into what? Right, in a flat two-dimensional chart. And now ask yourself, is it possible to objectively assess the multidimensional nature of what is happening, in two dimensions? Never.
2. Fundamental analysis. Same eggs, only in profile. Let's ask ourselves the question, do we get the news in a timely manner? Does everything "tell" us? Is the information correct? What would work on the foundation (IMHO) you need a VERY hairy hand on the board of directors, preferably the world's leading bank. If you don't have such a paw, you will always fall behind and usually miss out.
3. The whole game is concentrated in the hands of the leading banks, and corporations they have data direction, volume, degree of growth, etc. do you think banks are willing, to give you money for nothing? The answer is obvious.
To sum up my post: The average trader, always works on someone else's field, by someone else's rules, which means that in the end it will always be a loser.
I am honoured.