
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The quotes can be stored in integers by multiplying them by 10000 and 100 (for Japanese) accordingly.
You can also store key points and the offset relative to the last quote.
All these problems are technical.
The main problem is strategic.
Quotors do NOT WANT and, I think, will not do it. Only if the terminal is squeezed by competitors, there will be a prerequisite for a ticking terminal.
There is another problem. Customers don't pay for the terminal.
It is paid by DTs who buy servers, and DTs are NOT INTERESTED in the tick terminal, because there will be expert pipsers who work on DT quotes peculiarities.
It is unlikely that brokerage companies think about the terminal (tick or time terminal). They have other interests. All that is necessary for brokerage companies, I think, is already given by the developers (permission/prohibition of auto-trading, cancellation of deals at non-market prices and so on). The championship statistics shows that any brokerage company can arrange a good "kitchen" and the appearance of some special tick terminal will not change anything fundamental, at least brokerage companies will hardly oppose its introduction, if it is developed. Well, since there is no detailed proof of the need to introduce tick series yet, the issue will be where it is now.
It would be interesting to look at the results of tick proofs from the Omega platform, which "does anything - any tick and timeframe".
Although the discussion about brokers is already beyond the scope of the forum. I guess they'll clean it all up now?:o)
"MQL4: Tick collector
The Expert Advisor saves tick history for specified symbols
Dear solandr!
Why are you so irritated by this polemic? Why do you persist in believing that you know everything about the future - both what to do and what not to do?
The "proof building" program proposed by you is wrong in principle. You want to make the success of tick trading the only credible argument. If you reason like that, then none of the existing t/fs are needed at all - no one has yet reported radical success thanks to a particular t/f.
I inform you. I have long ago written an Expert Advisor, which not only writes the tick history, but also displays it in real time on the chart. So, everything that can be done in other frames can be done in a tick chart. It once again shows what a powerful tool MT4+MCL4 is. It also shows that it's not so difficult to make this service built-in.
Besides, I've spent a lot of time on researching tick data. It absolutely does not matter whether I succeeded in the market because of it or not. People achieve something or not because of their ability and hard work. But in order for a result to be achieved, they must FIRST have the ability. This condition is not sufficient, but necessary ! :-)
Why the question is there a possibility to work with timeframes, and not with tick-frames? This situation is understandable due to limited capabilities (time, human, etc.) of developers. But it is completely unacceptable in terms of service completeness and strategy. Therefore, if it more or less suits the market today, it will not do so tomorrow.
Exactly! That's my point exactly.
By the way, this thing should be implemented as an EA. The indicator skips ticks !
To avoid rubbing the file it has to be opened like this: FILE_BIN|FILE_READ|FILE_WRITE
And before you write into it, set the write pointer to the end of the file.
People have asked the developers to make a ticking history, the developers categorically refused. So what next? You will just write here a mountain of complaints that the developers have not listened to the "wishes of the working people"? I, for my part, simply suggested a rational option for applying pressure on the developers - that's all! If everyone just wants endless verbal complaints without any real progress on the issue, then, please, I personally have nothing against it.
Of course, I want to thank for the Expert Advisor, but I just looked it up, it saves data in csv, while mine was designed to store it in history and then the chart can be opened and analyzed offline.
Simple csv to fxt converter.
It is necessary to combine my Expert Advisor and this script, and patch it up a bit - it will be perfect ;)
Tick data will complicate their lives for the following reasons:
1. If tick data is available, the Expert Advisors trading on tick symbol are sure to appear, and therefore there will be huge difficulties with the overlapping of such experts.
2) if reliable tick data is available, the possibility of testing tick experts in the tester will become available (which will also increase their number)
3. After access to tick data, the public will demand access to REAL volumes :))))))
4. 4th place is occupied by unwillingness or busyness of developers (if there were demand of brokerage companies, they would create it in a fortnight :))
5. And finally a "trump" argument about insane traffic and disk space...