In addition, we can incorporate elements of random selection into the calculation algorithm, and of almost any complexity. For example, the simplest version of :
gives an infinite set of possible results, subject, however, to a given statistic :
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
You have one loss twice the weekly profit. There's no point in counting.
That is already in the past.
Now it's going to be different.
A useful clarification for the evaluation.
Let's clarify the problem. What is the value of the loss? What method of calculation do we adopt? etc.
With no stops and high volume, one trade is enough.
If, for example, you take
the final result changes quite significantly
If, for example, you take
the final result changes quite significantly
If one out of three trades is losing, then the deposit is dead?
No, of course not.
It all depends on the parameters.
Let me make another example, just to be clear.
If, for example, every second closes at SL
then the results would look like this :
In addition, we can incorporate elements of random selection into the calculation algorithm, and of almost any complexity. For example, the simplest version of :
gives an infinite set of possible results, subject, however, to a given statistic :
etc.
.