OrderSendAsync() function - page 9
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
No question -- portfolio trading + market execution.
Given the speed of execution required, you could be more specific - multi-currency arbitrage. I don't see any other application (maybe I'm not looking hard enough?).
To what extent is this technology applicable in practice? As far as I know, at quotation level of one brokerage company such collisions do not occur. Maybe, on ECN... But all the same: 1) Kamikaze-mod, 2) rare event + low volume. Is it worth the effort? I doubt it.
1. My previous post was about solving the execution problem when the connection breaks down. The server will not be able to return responses if there is an interruption.
2. In high-frequency trading, speed is more important. Here it is important to send your orders faster than others, and then check their execution. If you are going to wait for the server to answer every time you send a request, you will be outrun by those who will not wait for these answers.
1. I agree.
2. Already wrote above. All this applies only to multicurrency arbitrage. Troubling the developers to create a narrowly applicable feature for 0.001% of potential clients - of course you can and should. The only odd thing is this. With the wrong/unsophisticated fundamentals in place, engage in some sort of elective. But that's just so... free subjective interpretation. In the end, synchronous function OrderSend() remains untouched, my interests are not infringed. :)