Market: How will situations of product failure be handled after a build update ? - page 11

 

I think MQs have already expressed their views on the question.

Renat, responding on the first page of the thread, made it clear that he does not see the question (which is why he answered some other question that only he knows).


And, as someone correctly pointed out, the market will put everything in its place. If you want to sell, sit at your monitor 365 days a year and check for new builds. If you don't want to sell, that's OK, there will be those who want to.

"Business the Russian way", quite in the style of MQ.

 
komposter:

"Business the Russian way", quite in the style of MQs.

Pardon me, I don't understand, is "Business Russian" good or bad?
 
joo:
I'm sorry, I don't understand, is "Russian Business" good or bad?

"What's good for the Russian is bad for the German".

I was speaking in a negative context.

 
komposter:

...sit behind your monitor 365 days a year and check for new builds...

Strange to hear that from a programmer (correct me if I'm wrong about your specialization), is it really something a creative person enjoys...? It is like Michelangelo would be forced to carve stones for paving a road. Where is the common sense?
 
Wangelys:
Strange to hear that from a programmer (correct me if I'm wrong about your specialisation), is it really something a creative person would enjoy...? It is like Michelangelo would be forced to carve stones for paving a road. Where is the common sense?

There's no point, and I don't.

What is the question?

 
Our approach is to stabilise EX5 and not change versions to keep it compatible as much as possible. On the other hand, to allow authors to release updates and to update purchased/free software to users on a regular basis.

I think we can deal with the problems.
Reason: