Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 1361
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
...psychology is not a science...
Do you believe in Artificial Intelligence? If so, how can you create it without understanding emotions, feelings, consciousness, subconsciousness, etc.? And all this belongs to the field of psychology.
Do you believe in Artificial Intelligence? If so, how can you create it without understanding emotions, feelings, consciousness, subconsciousness, etc.? It's all part of psychology, isn't it?
An orgasm is just a muscle spasm.
I don't want to talk about eternal things, I went from pagan consciousness to postmodernism long time ago.In other words, after receiving a signal, you wait some more time to assess the development of events - this question is no longer clear.
No I don't - the fact of development is the signal. What are you waiting for? The analysis is always on and the market is always moving, but it does not mean anything.
Probably just modeling metabolic regulation would be easier, I think, than teaching a machine to think. And in general, indeed, the AI in its pure form and the human brain are quite different.
There in the video that Maxim posted, says that one second of one percent of the brain cells simulated 40 minutes of super-computer, the fourth most powerful in the world!!!
Psychology is not a science, calm down, you old psycho, calm down... I know more than some people.
Then everything is clear with you...
Programming is not a science, but why universities have cybernetics departments - it is not clear....
orgasm is just a muscle spasm.
I don't want to engage in dialogues about eternal things, I went from pagan consciousness to postmodernism a long time agoMy point is that without accepting psychology as a science, we cannot understand and reproduce the basic properties of our intelligence in artificial form. So we will never create AI.
No, I don't - the fact of development is the signal. What are you waiting for? The analysis is constantly going on and there are constant movements in the market, but it does not mean anything.
So, while there is an open position there always comes a signal confirming it or closing by the stop level and again listening to the signal - I do not understand.
My point is that without accepting psychology as a science, we cannot understand and reproduce the basic properties of our intelligence in artificial form. So we will never create AI.
Go study hidden Markovian states better, and don't babble on with your psychology
that's the answer to the question, if anythinggo study hidden Markovian states better, and don't babble on with your psychology.
That's an answer to the question, if anythingYou don't have to be rude. I'm not being rude to you. We're having an adult conversation here. No aggression. We are not teenagers...
Then everything is clear with you...
Programming is not a science, and why universities have departments of cybernetics - it is not clear....
So that there are specialists.) Absolutely pragmatic task.) There is no science.