Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 1327
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
This may be something incomprehensible and strange for many people. But in the end you all will come to bruteforce, without all this stupid construction of features, targets, and other kindergarten stuff. And then there will be a desire to discuss only the details of who has how it is implemented.
All that concerns traits, target and subsamples I do not want to discuss anymore.
I will respond only to sensible ideas on the "right" bruteforce.
This may be something incomprehensible and strange for many people. But in the end you all will come to bruteforce without all this dumb designing features, targets, and other kindergarten stuff. And then there will be a desire to discuss only the details of who has how it is implemented.
So and so I have brutforce, the question in what direction to brutforce, and how to reduce randomness in applying the model.
So and so I have brutforce, the question is in what direction to brutforce, and how to reduce randomness in applying the model.
when there will be a plateau of models with approximately the same results, then from these to choose
when there will be a plateau of models with roughly the same results, then from these to choose
It's already clear, the question is how to properly move towards it. That's why I'm going over and over again, looking for improvements.
It's clear as it is, the question is how to move towards it in the right way. That's why I'm doing a little bit of everything, looking for improvements.
Well, that's brutforce too.
Better yet, don't bruteforce, read a book
which describes almost 100 years of experience "twisting"
Well, that's a brutforce, too.
Better yet, don't twist it, read a book
which describe almost 100 years of "twisting" experience
I do not know what is better experience or theory - I do not yet have enough of either.
But I do like to check my ideas, see the result, correct and improve.
I don't know which is better, experience or theory - I don't have either one yet.
But, I like to test my ideas, see the result, correct and improve.
The theory shows that few people in the market earn consistently, almost no one
The theory shows that there are few people in the market who earn consistently, almost no one.
I'm studying the latest things in the MO about the markets and in general, and so far I don't see that there are super breakthrough methods for predicting naked BP.
Purely for research purposes, I am interested in the depth of the rabbit holeThe theory shows that few people in the market earn consistently, almost no one
The theory shows that there are very few people in the market who earn consistently, almost no one.
I'm studying the latest things in MO about markets and in general, and so far I don't see that there are super breakthrough methods for predicting naked BP.
Purely for research purposes I am interested in the depth of the rabbit holeYou are in a bad mood today, no optimism...
You seem to be in a bad mood today, no optimism...
What's mood here, I'm only writing about the conclusions)
it looks like we need to pump R instead of python, Renat wrote that soon there will be a direct link without crutches
i.e. katbust will be able to run in 1 line from mt5
Has anything specific become known? I've seen only his message about "gifts", without any details.