request for help in interpreting the test

New comment
 

I've been working on EA for several weeks, testing it in various ways, especially walk-forward and etc.

Today I did a unit test for 3 years for two four different combinations


1. Setup 1 and Risk Management  1

2. Setup 1 and Risk Management  2

3. Setup 2 and Risk Management  1

4. Setup 2 and Risk Management  2


I assumed when writing the rules that

1. Risk Management #2 is safer than Risk Management #1.

2. Setup #2 is safer than Setup #1.


I got such results as in atachments.

And honestly looking at the Equity to Balance chart, I would choose # 4, because equity is close to Balance, but on the other hand in the drawdown report it is greater than in set # 1.


ask: how would you interpret these four sets: pros and cons ?









 
Some summary reports do not match the charts. But looking at the charts the risk is the same on all variants. Infinite.
 
Enrique Dangeroux #:
Some summary reports do not match the charts. But looking at the charts the risk is the same on all variants. Infinite.

1. I checked again, reports agree with the charts. Give a concrete example of which graph you do not agree with which report?


2. What do you mean the risk is infinite ? and how did you read that from the charts? The risk is limited by managing the closing of positions based on stop rules.


3. You are not answering my question in the post :(

New comment