Discussion of article "Combinatorics and probability theory for trading (Part II): Universal fractal" - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Of course there is no such thing, you understand how time-consuming and painstaking work it is, but I started this thread for a reason. I will try to do everything that depends on me, and in general, such questions, if to be honest, should be handled by a whole team of mathematicians and programmers, if not a whole institute. What one person can oppose it? Even if you have a super brain, there is so much data to process that you can go crazy. I am trying to set those tasks that are commensurate with my time and capabilities, yes I can do more, but it does not depend on me now. Time is the most valuable resource. If there were people who are interested in complex analyses and complete dedication I would be happy to do it. Nevertheless, the branch will continue and I will cover the material that I can, I always try to tell something new, as far as I can.
Keith Devlin, Professor of Mathematics at Stanford University explains it simply: "..... Most people don't understand maths, and can't even understand how a formula like the golden ratio applies to a complex system, so they can't test themselves either. People think they see the golden ratio everywhere, in nature and in their favourite objects, but they can't substantiate it. They are victims of their natural desire to find meaning in the various objects of the universe, but because of their lack of mathematical literacy, they cannot realise that the patterns they detect are illusory."
People program themselves (zombify) to find a simple explanation and seek to maintain this belief, this is the essence of religious thinking, including in trading...
Advaita Vedanta straight, about illusory. 👏👏👏
Ms Blavatsky carrying stuff...directly influenced the outcome of WW2.
And in general, is there any possibility to create a group on special passes, so that all sorts of deniers do not interfere?
Everything can be started, but a lot of questions come up at once. The most important one is for what and what do we want as a result? The second question is immediately asked, what labour costs and what kind of output? The third question is who can grant this output? I have been a dreamer for a long time, but it did not lead to anything. You have to be realistic. Time is money. When we start making realistic estimates of all this, there will be a question number 33 and 333. Let's be realistic, please. Although I don't mind discussion on this topic and I can see that people are interested. I could write a lot of things here and raise a lot of questions, but whether it is appropriate, whether people want this discussion, I don't know, honestly.
The myth about the universality of the golden ratio in nature has grown so much that people don't even bother themselves with real checks, succumbing to the charms of the beauty of the very idea of the ratio of the whole and its parts, but in fact it is not so:
The only reason why markets can sometimes (key word ANOTHER time) nicely pullback/breakout fibo levels is because of the collective belief of a large number of technical traders in fibo levels (a self-fulfilling prophecy) if they collectively put their stops/limits there, but even that probably won't work because the professional participants, the big institutional players will trade on some other basis, and the breakdown/reversal of the Fibo level may be just random, but for believers in the EQ it will certainly be a confirmation of their faith.
Keith Devlin, Professor of Mathematics at Stanford University explains it simply: "..... Most people don't understand maths, and can't even understand how a formula like the golden ratio applies to a complex system, so they can't test themselves either. People think they see the golden ratio everywhere, in nature and in their favourite objects, but they can't substantiate it. They are victims of their natural desire to find meaning in the various objects of the universe, but because of their lack of mathematical literacy, they cannot realise that the patterns they detect are illusory."
People programme themselves (zombie) to search for a simple explanation and strive to maintain this belief, this is the essence of religious thinking, including in trading...
I agree with this too )). There is a very correct thought here by the way. It wouldn't be so funny if it wasn't so sad DDDDD
Mrs Blavatsky, by carrying stuff...directly influenced the outcome of WW2.
Probably stopped a big projectile with her head 😂 That's the question of sanity.
the story is an interesting one.
the said madam organised a society in the States which was mainly active in India, as a result of which England was short of imports from there and had to try to keep order in the colonies rather than fight a war.
and as a result of the war in the pacific got nothing there.
and yes, the name of Madam Von Gan, before the transcriptions were mixed up with a well-known Freemason.
history is an interesting thing.
the mentioned madam organised a society in the States, which carried out its main activity in India, as a result of which England under-received imports from there and was forced not so much to fight as to try to keep order in the colonies.
and according to the results of the war in the Pacific Ocean did not get anything there.
And yes, Madam von Gahn's surname (before mixing transcriptions with one notorious Freemason).
Within the framework of the impulse equilibrium theory, an elementary (fractal) structure of market price movements has been identified. It is called "M-shape".
Within the framework of the impulse equilibrium theory, an elementary (fractal) structure of market price movements has been identified. It is called "M-shape"
Alexander, you would at least diversify your comments, it's funny already, honestly. Copypaste from time to time, have a conscience or I do not know, tell me why do you write it everywhere in each of my articles? People make jokes at least, something write that is interesting to read and you one phrase I do not know how many times you copy in my threads, I do not mind but you are not shy? I apologise to the moderators, but I just can't. My thread has nothing to do with your theory, calm down already.