Discussion of article "Applying the probability theory to trading gaps" - page 3

New comment
 
Aleksey Nikolayev #:

And you are still trying to prove to everyone that the name is wrong.

The point is not in the name, but in the fact that the phenomena are of different nature. You can generalise or mix them.)
 
Aleksey Nikolayev #:

There are few ordinary gaps in Forex, therefore their generalisation was studied in addition to them.

The rarity of a phenomenon does not mean its unprofitability. On the contrary, rare phenomena are sudden and large, so they influence the market more strongly.
If weekly gaps are not enough, you can also take news gaps (however, they are also of another kind).

 
secret #:
The point is not in the name, but in the fact that the phenomena are of different nature. You can generalise, or you can mix them.)

The difference in their nature did not prevent us from using the same mathematical apparatus for them. Since the main topic of the paper is to describe a mathematical method, the similarity of that method is the basis for considering these phenomena together. It is similar to how in a school problem book there can be side by side problems about candy and diggers, despite the essential difference in the types of these objects.

 
secret #:
The rarity of a phenomenon does not mean that it is unprofitable. Rather on the contrary, rare phenomena are sudden and large, so they influence the market more strongly.
If weekly gaps are not enough, you can also take news gaps (though, they are also of a different kind).

Within the framework of the article, their insufficiency means that it is impossible to demonstrate the essence of the described mathematical apparatus on the basis of classical gaps only.

Nothing prevents you from demonstrating what a proper article about gaps should look like. Except, of course, your inability to write it.

 
I have no complaints about you or your article) I just told you where the additional possibilities lie. Perhaps a bit aggressive, but that's the way it is here).
 
secret #:
I have no complaints about you or your article) I just told you where the additional possibilities lie. Perhaps a bit aggressive, but that's how it is done here).

I also have no claims to you) Nevertheless, I still wish you to write an article about gaps, considering them from a different angle and on more markets than it is done here) I am sure it will be useful both for you and for the whole adequate part of the forum.

123
New comment