so can we treat each timeframe as its own "oscillator" ...for example using a 1 sma....and therefore apply the Kuramoto in that way.
in theroy when your timeframe "synchs up" you KNOW you have a good trade on that timeframe. pretty freaking awesome in theory.
can you guys make this into an indicator
am wondering
this is really a good interesting article for us to consider..... if we like correlations, but we all know they aren't predictive by virtue of its correlation...however quantum synchronization is in fact predictive in the natural world we are in..... that is proven math and science.... so when it comes to financial predictions that are on a quantum level nothing more than human behavior....perhaps quantum synchronization gives the answer...... if nothing else it gives us a way to try to better use correlations
i am not an math guy but it is very fascinating
Quantum Synchronization for Multi Variable Packet Switching Security - ResearchGate
Quantum Synchronization for Multi Variable Packet Switching Security - ResearchGate
[1302.3810] Synchronization, quantum correlations and entanglement in oscillator networks
etc. you guys have google too lol
all in good fun... i'm WAY out of my league... just figured i'd show something interesting here
Interesting links. Thanks

- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use
Quantum Synchronization
1. Is this how the banks communicate https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_key_distribution
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuramoto_model is this model possible to make an indicator to decode
3. the theory being that the market is alive and can be synched just like a bunch of fireflies
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#safe=off&tbm=vid&q=kuramoto+synchronization
math is not my strong point, + I'm not a coder + i'm more of a logic guy so i thought i'd throw this up FWIW
Mladen mentioned the drawbacks of end pointing and my research led me back to quantum synchronization...
logically this does appear to make more sense