Coding help - page 760
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Thanks a lot for your fast reply! Could you please tell me where can
I find the current code of the moving averages:
enum enMaTypes
{
ma_sma, // simple moving average - SMA
ma_ema, // exponential moving average - EMA
ma_dsema, // double smoothed exponential moving average - DSEMA
ma_dema, // double exponential moving average - DEMA
ma_tema, // tripple exponential moving average - TEMA
ma_smma, // smoothed moving average - SMMA
ma_lwma, // linear weighted moving average - LWMA
ma_pwma, // parabolic weighted moving average - PWMA
ma_alxma, // Alexander moving average - ALXMA
ma_vwma, // volume weighted moving average - VWMA
ma_hull, // Hull moving average
ma_tma, // triangular moving average
ma_sine, // sine weighted moving average
ma_linr, // linear regression value
ma_ie2, // IE/2
ma_nlma, // non lag moving average
ma_zlma, // zero lag moving average
ma_lead, // leader exponential moving average
ma_ssm, // super smoother
ma_smoo // smoother
};
As far as I know this is the last list of moving averages available as open code
(other MAs are already in ex4 format).
Post Deleted.
Hi friends...
To use the same expert in "different paritys at the same time", the following magic number sequence is correct?
- Parity A MagicNumber: 123456
- Parity B MagicNumber: 123457
- Parity C MagicNumber:123458
- Parity D MagicNumber: 123459 etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"simple ( Regularized ema) EA 1.3" does make a difference and it will not mix up orders from different instances of the EA, so it is OK to use it that way
If the EA identifies the orders by a magic number, then it is OK
"simple ( Regularized ema) EA 1.3" does make a difference and it will not mix up orders from different instances of the EA, so it is OK to use it that way
Does this different code design also apply to "simple (stepma of rsi adaptive ema 2.9) EA" ?
https://www.forex-tsd.com/forum/exclusive/1807982-simple-experts/page12
Post: #177
Does this different code design also apply to "simple (stepma of rsi adaptive ema 2.9) EA" ?
https://www.forex-tsd.com/forum/exclusive/1807982-simple-experts/page12
Post: #177
Yes
Vaoouw!
Perfect :)
If the EA identifies the orders by a magic number, then it is OK
"simple (Regularized ema) EA 1.3" does make a difference and it will not mix up orders from different instances of the EA, so it is OK to use it that way
mladen,
"simple (Regularized ema) EA 1.3" was active in 5 different parities at the same time from 10 am to 9 pm but it did not open any orders!
Is there a problem in this ea for opening orders?
P.S: They were (ecn-pro) tickmill demo chart.
mladen,
"simple (Regularized ema) EA 1.3" was active in 5 different parities at the same time from 10 am to 9 pm but it did not open any orders!
Is there a problem in this ea for opening orders?
P.S: They were (ecn-pro) tickmill demo chart.