You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
If you don't want to post all the code, so that the error can be reproduced, please code something that you can post in full that will reproduce the same error.
See my post just before this.
11/13/2013 03:25 PM 37,911 Ind_error_tester_Neutralized.mq4
You attached
11/13/2013 03:25 PM 37,911 Ind_error_tester_Neutralized.mq4
Yes sorry. Ive attached again.
. . . why is your function type int ?
Pity you didn't answer this question . . . make the function a void as it doesn't need to return anything, remove the return(0) recompile, what happens ?
Yes that also sorts it. BUT why? I mean what if we say the function was an int and we needed the value. Why is it that changing part of the objects solves it wether the function is int or not. Even start, init and deinit are ints and they return(0) so that isnt the issue.
Apparently it can't handle that large of a function.
whroeder getting what im talking about.
Yes that also sorts it. BUT why? I mean what if we say the function was an int and we needed the value. Why is it that changing part of the objects solves it wether the function is int or not. Even start, init and deinit are ints and they return(0) so that isnt the issue.
whroeder getting what im talking about.