
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You are trying to deceive beginners by cheating your EA and/or backtest results in some ways, and you know it very well.
"In some ways" How? dont make accussations while you dont know what you are arguing about. I already said it attempts 100% by not closing anything at a loss but waiting for it to become profitable. The floating losses will be managed by the dynamic lots and % of balance used as lots thereby making it hard to hit margin call.
Much better. My opinion of your system is that it's too risky. Risky however is a relative term, if you feel you can live with relative draw-downs of 50% with a chance of blowing the account ??? then trade-it. However, I'll advise you to run your system in Monte-Carlo mode to get a better statistic of how-often this 50% draw-downs happens. And your Risk_Of_Ruin vs your BankRoll etc.
I just woke up and seen your data, decided to put something together which could somewhat duplicate the results and here's the codes and results below. Note: On my 1st run, it went bankrupt. 2nd and 3rd runs looks like the result below:
Based on my three runs, I'd say 'my' system have a 1-in-3 chances of bankrupting 10k within the tested time period. The result you're displaying is just one Static [Positive] performance of the system. Anyone trading this system would keep asking themselves "what if price never comes back?". My recommendation is that you produce thousands of runs in-order to test how well your system predicts bouncy-periods. Also extend the time-frame and test on other pairs.
Codes hastily written and not intended for Real_Money usage. I might remove the codes later.
"In some ways" How? dont make accussations while you dont know what you are arguing about. I already said it attempts 100% by not closing anything at a loss but waiting for it to become profitable. The floating losses will be managed by the dynamic lots and % of balance used as lots thereby making it hard to hit margin call.
oh so im the one who put the errors on mt4? There is no time you can strategy test and you get 0 mismatched errors lol you truly dont know what you are saying undertaker look alike
It is very possible to have zero mismatched chart errors . . . it simply depends on your data and how it has been constructed, for example creating M1 to MN1 from the same tick data should result in very few errors . . .
oh so im the one who put the errors on mt4? There is no time you can strategy test and you get 0 mismatched errors lol you truly dont know what you are saying undertaker look alike
I've done hundreds of backtest and I've never seen this error.
Anyway, you want opinion, mine is that your EA can only be used to blow out an account.
May be I am wrong when I think your are cheating, sorry for that. If your are not, as your here from january 2010, your are very naive, at least.
It is possible to do such a test
I can make it also
strategy if high highest 18 bars buy
if low lowest 18 bars sell no stoploss
with also trailing this result (foolish game)