Not to hide its faults, the EA cannot keep its promise after the year 2006. It performs poor in 2007 and worse in 2008, I am still trying to figure out the problems with these years. I think which may related to the market enviornment change.
That happens. Things may seem quite consistent for a while, and then completely change. Yes, things change, and that's about as technical an answer as I can give you. :)
Some EAs may just need the parameters to be re-optimized, others need significant re-writes.
Can I ask a question? How can I increase the percentage of the modelling quality? I have no ideal how to get it like 100%. The history data is download from download center, is there something I can do to make it more accuracy? Thanks.
Please have a read on 'One-Minute Data Modelling Quality Rating' I have found. The modelling quality is not possible to more than 25% with 1M chart. So my test is already the best quality I can do. Thanks.
Please have a read on 'One-Minute Data Modelling Quality Rating' I have found. The modelling quality is not possible to more than 25% with 1M chart. So my test is already the best quality I can do. Thanks.
You should still be better off testing with EA that has > 25% modelling quality, even with 1M timeframe.
I am still working with my EA trying to add more logics to it. I have gone live with my EA for almost a month now with impressing results, sorry, don't plan to share it either. I have a day job, so EA is my best choice, make money while you sleep and work ;)
Here is the result of my EA with 90% modelling quality on 5M chart, backtested from Jan 05, 2009 through Apr 10, 2009, (simulation of 30% Requotes was added to the EA for backtesting purposes only) with $1000 (one thousand dollar) initial capital with maximal drawdown of 6.07%
Good luck!
Символ | GBPUSD (Great Britain Pound vs US Dollar) | ||||
Период | 15 Минут (M15) 2009.02.06 00:00 - 2009.04.06 00:00 (2009.02.06 - 2009.04.06) | ||||
Модель | Контрольные точки (очень грубый метод, результаты нельзя принимать во внимание) | ||||
Параметры | Risk=27; SL=900; TP=500; Проходов=1; | ||||
Баров в истории | 4889 | Смоделировано тиков | 139284 | Качество моделирования | n/a |
Ошибки рассогласования графиков | 165 | ||||
Начальный депозит | 500.00 | ||||
Чистая прибыль | 125369027.55 | Общая прибыль | 125369441.55 | Общий убыток | -414.00 |
Прибыльность | 302824.74 | Матожидание выигрыша | 455887.37 | ||
Абсолютная просадка | 453.60 | Максимальная просадка | 1373000.00 (1.77%) | Относительная просадка | 0.35% (651.86) |
Всего сделок | 275 | Короткие позиции (% выигравших) | 137 (99.27%) | Длинные позиции (% выигравших) | 138 (100.00%) |
Прибыльные сделки (% от всех) | 274 (99.64%) | Убыточные сделки (% от всех) | 1 (0.36%) | ||
Самая большая | прибыльная сделка | 500000.00 | убыточная сделка | -414.00 | |
Средняя | прибыльная сделка | 457552.71 | убыточная сделка | -414.00 | |
Максимальное количество | непрерывных выигрышей (прибыль) | 274 (125369441.55) | непрерывных проигрышей (убыток) | 1 (-414.00) | |
Максимальная | непрерывная прибыль (число выигрышей) | 125369441.55 (274) | непрерывный убыток (число проигрышей) | -414.00 (1) | |
Средний | непрерывный выигрыш | 274 | непрерывный проигрыш | 1 |
After have some study on !Graal_For_Tester!, it just amazing how an EA can work in this way with damn good performance. It works like some kind of pattern matching with historial data but it is difficult to collect statistic data with live trade that need to randomly open orders for generate statistic data. Interesting! Bring me a new look of an EA. Thanks.
After have some study on !Graal_For_Tester!, it just amazing how an EA can work in this way with damn good performance. It works like some kind of pattern matching with historial data but it is difficult to collect statistic data with live trade that need to randomly open orders for generate statistic data. Interesting! Bring me a new look of an EA. Thanks.
Don't get confused, there are 2 people posting here in the last 3 posts before your post. My EA only made less than a million in 3 months, while the other EA (with Russian language) produced 125Million in 2 months! (Stop loss of 900 pips!).
My EA only uses 25pips SL - 12pips TP and 5% Risk, I don't know if I have the guts to trade with Stoploss of 900 pips.
Good Luck!
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use
Holy Grail?...Noooope, not yet. But let me share my report with you guys. Honestly, no cheating, no money management with fixed lots size 0.3 lots, no risk control with fixed stoploss 25 pips. Trade only one trade in a time. Please don't misleading by the EA name, it is not only looking for 10pips in profit. It created in purpose for testing entry and exit signals, so it is not a complete EA. Please don't ask me for the EA, I won't share it out. But question are welcome. Not to hide its faults, the EA cannot keep its promise after the year 2006. It performs poor in 2007 and worse in 2008, I am still trying to figure out the problems with these years. I think which may related to the market enviornment change. If anyone have ideas, please give me an advise and thanks. Below is my report:
Strategy Tester Report
XABCT Lib 10pips Test
FXDD-MT4 Demo Server 2 (Build 223)