Anyone can convert this profitable strategy to EA

New comment
 

hi, guys

I have very very nice strategy it's called "sab7-sab7"

it's very simple >>>

It's based on the crossing of EMA's

1- If EMA (7) cross up EMA (15) and RSI value was more than 50

then you enter " buy"

2-If EMA (7) cross down EMA (15) and RSI value was less then 40

then you enter " sell"

optional : if EMA (7) cross up EMA (15) and both cross up EMA (90) + RSI value was more than 50 thats mean you have a big target

and vise versa

I - and other people- tested the strategy and it was profitable but its disadvantage you have to stick to your PC much much time

my info about creating EA is too little

If anybody can covert it to EA thats will be Great

Thanks in advance

 
basomakm wrote >>

hi, guys

I have very very nice strategy it's called "sab7-sab7"

it's very simple >>>

It's based on the crossing of EMA's

1- If EMA (7) cross up EMA (15) and RSI value was more than 50

then you enter " buy"

2-If EMA (7) cross down EMA (15) and RSI value was less then 40

then you enter " sell"

optional : if EMA (7) cross up EMA (15) and both cross up EMA (90) + RSI value was more than 50 thats mean you have a big target

and vise versa

I - and other people- tested the strategy and it was profitable but its disadvantage you have to stick to your PC much much time

my info about creating EA is too little

If anybody can covert it to EA thats will be Great

Thanks in advance

On which currency pair and which timeframe did you tested ?

Fabio

 
basomakm wrote >>

If anybody can covert it to EA thats will be Great

I can convert for free if you prove it is profitable.

 
goldtrader:

I can convert for free if you prove it is profitable.

You must be a hell of mql4 programmer.... It takes 10min to write this EA do you need him to prove if it is profitable?


Send me you email and I will write it for you for free...



Best Regards

 
forex.sb:

You must be a hell of mql4 programmer.... It takes 10min to write this EA do you need him to prove if it is profitable?


Send me you email and I will write it for you for free...



Best Regards


agreed, this is dead easy, so much so I think I wrote something like it in my spare time about a month ago.


and I hate to say it, but I suspect as an EA it isn't really that profitable. Would love to be proven wrong though, so I will write it for you if nobody else does.

 
basomakm:

hi, guys

I have very very nice strategy it's called "sab7-sab7"

it's very simple >>>

It's based on the crossing of EMA's

1- If EMA (7) cross up EMA (15) and RSI value was more than 50

then you enter " buy"

2-If EMA (7) cross down EMA (15) and RSI value was less then 40

then you enter " sell"

optional : if EMA (7) cross up EMA (15) and both cross up EMA (90) + RSI value was more than 50 thats mean you have a big target

and vise versa

I - and other people- tested the strategy and it was profitable but its disadvantage you have to stick to your PC much much time

my info about creating EA is too little

If anybody can covert it to EA thats will be Great

Thanks in advance

interesting, I agree in principal with your EMA 90 theory, I used EMO 200 to do something similar, but not quite. if EMA (low) crosses EMA (high) AND both EMA's above EMA (superhigh) then buy, other way for sell.


based on the theory you only do buys if your above a long range EMA, and only sells if your below.

 
forex.sb wrote >>

You must be a hell of mql4 programmer.... It takes 10min to write this EA do you need him to prove if it is profitable?

Send me you email and I will write it for you for free...

Best Regards

thanks very much "forex.sb"

my email is basomakm@gmail.com

time frame is 1 hour

 
Fabio wrote >>

On which currency pair and which timeframe did you tested ?

Fabio

time frame is 1 hour

 
goldtrader wrote >>

I can convert for free if you prove it is profitable.

if it's not profitable why i need to convert it to EA ?!!!!

 

can you pls upload the EA here?


also i think it will work on 5M timeframe

 

hi basomakm,

I think you consider this a indicator, yeah? Seems the idea give when to entry only, still lack of "how to exit". Or just close the order when you see the opposite entry signal appear?

12
New comment