Hello everyone, Eudora Aegis Gold has been tested across multiple ECN/RAW brokers (IC Markets, Pepperstone, Tickmill, RoboForex among others) and the results stay consistent with the figures shown in the description, provided XAUUSD spread stays below 30 points and latency to broker server is under 50ms.
That said, broker conditions on Gold can vary significantly — different liquidity providers, different spread behavior during London/NY overlap, different execution quality on M5 scalping.
If you run the backtest (or the demo on a live feed) on your broker and the results don't come close to the published numbers, please post here:
Broker name and account type (ECN / RAW / Standard)
Average XAUUSD spread during London/NY sessions
Leverage and test capital
The result you got vs. what you expected
I'll review each case personally and either provide a tuned set file for your broker, or tell you straight if your conditions aren't compatible with the strategy. No point selling an EA that won't perform on your setup.
Thanks for testing seriously before buying — that's exactly the right approach.
Broker compatibility — feedback welcome
Hello everyone, Eudora Aegis Gold has been tested across multiple ECN/RAW brokers (IC Markets, Pepperstone, Tickmill, RoboForex among others) and the results stay consistent with the figures shown in the description, provided XAUUSD spread stays below 30 points and latency to broker server is under 50ms.
That said, broker conditions on Gold can vary significantly — different liquidity providers, different spread behavior during London/NY overlap, different execution quality on M5 scalping.
If you run the backtest (or the demo on a live feed) on your broker and the results don't come close to the published numbers, please post here:
I'll review each case personally and either provide a tuned set file for your broker, or tell you straight if your conditions aren't compatible with the strategy. No point selling an EA that won't perform on your setup.
Thanks for testing seriously before buying — that's exactly the right approach.