Samuel Cavalcanti Costa / Perfil

General presentation about my projects:
- Golden Days = It's the original project, the most important project of all. Its proposal is to have two stages: first, leverage, then generate passive income. By default, stage 1 is configured to convert 10 USD into 1 million USD, and stage 2 to generate 0.5% per day, which averages 10% per month. It's a bot to "forget about on the VPS" and simply manage the risks. Extremely risky.
- Kit-Trader Golden Days = It's a slip I made so I could trade manually, with the intention of discovering new ways to continually improve all my robots! It's also an excellent tool for traders who like to trade manually. The risk is 100% yours.
- American Dream = It is stage 1 of GoldenDays, with the default goal of turning 10usd into 100k usd. Extremely risky.
- Legacy Anchor = It is stage 2 of GoldenDays, with a standard goal of making 0.5% per day, with an average of 10% per month. Extremely risky.
- Robô Migalhas do Brasil = is the KitTrader GoldenDays, for the Brazilian stock exchange B3. Extremely risky.
- Boleta Migalhas do Brasil = is AmericanDream, and for the Brazilian stock exchange B3. The risk is 100% yours.

Platforms:
- MT5 - original
- MT4 - converted

UPDATED:
- Golden Days MT5 = https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/137129?source=Site+Market+Product+Page
- American Dream MT5 = https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/137199?source=Site+Market+Product+Page
- Legacy Anchor MT5 = https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/137262?source=Site+Market+Product+Page
- Kit-Trader Golden Days MT5 = https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/137321?source=Site+Profile

Subject: Clarification on Broker Performance with My Trading Algorithm

Hello World, I hope this message finds you well. Let me address the facts directly.

When I showcase results from a specific broker on my YouTube channel using my trading robot, it is because that broker has demonstrated 100% reliable execution. Currently, out of the 12 brokers I promote, only 3 are performing as expected. Among the remaining 9:

2 lack MetaTrader compatibility entirely.

For the other 7, the primary issue is their failure to halt trading after user-defined market close times configured in the MetaTrader executable.

Manual traders often overlook these issues, but systematic testing—using the identical robot on the same XAUUSD M1 chart under identical conditions—reveals the stark operational differences between brokers. I am not referring to leverage or margin requirements here, but rather to fundamental reliability: whether a broker executes orders (from traders or algorithms) as instructed, including basic functions like trailing stops.

I acknowledge other brokers’ offers of attractive commission-sharing arrangements. However, to exclusively promote a single broker would require a minimum guarantee of $20 million USD plus the #TrumpCard—anything less is unacceptable. My focus remains on advancing my algorithms to perform robustly even on suboptimal platforms. In some cases, a broker’s apparent suitability stems not from inherent quality, but from my continuous adaptation of the robots to function across both high- and low-caliber institutions.

These algorithms represent my life’s work. They will evolve indefinitely—for as long as automated trading exists. Market dynamics shift relentlessly; thus, "perfection" is unattainable. New versions will always emerge to address changing conditions.

I request only full transparency regarding your broker’s rules—no hidden terms. I will not judge operational constraints; my goal is to optimize my robots for minimally viable performance (e.g., 55% efficacy). Promoting brokers indiscriminately holds no interest for me. While thousands of brokers exist, few meet baseline functionality standards.

To brokers: Requests for promotional flexibility will be considered only with the aforementioned $20 million USD + #TrumpCard guarantee. Henceforth, I will exclusively publish results from brokers with 100% verified performance. Omission indicates ongoing development to meet a given broker’s requirements.

To traders and EA users: Exercise caution when selecting brokers based solely on influencer endorsements. Most financial promoters receive commissions from your trades—typically a fraction of the broker’s fee (e.g., $0.10 from a $0.30 commission per standard lot). While this is legitimate, understand that brokers may actively impede highly profitable algorithmic strategies. Why? Because market stability relies on most traders losing. Brokers profit from spreads/commissions regardless, yet they often discourage EAs that outperform manual trading—preserving the illusion of "professional influencer" success while 95% of traders fund the ecosystem.

Since developing my algorithms, I’ve witnessed systemic friction against exposing these realities—including ridicule toward those who attempt it. I recognize that dishonesty pervades this industry and enables most "professional influencers" to thrive. But I choose to operate within the 1% who prioritize verifiable results. Even silently, this work pulls back the curtain.

Adicionado o tópico Gerenciamento "fantasma" para B3