Conor Mcnamara / 프로필
- 정보
|
2 년도
경험
|
8
제품
|
4
데몬 버전
|
|
0
작업
|
0
거래 신호
|
0
구독자
|
I started learning C programming in 2010. From there I picked up many languages.
I have worked with MQL for just a year now. I pick up programming languages very quickly because I'm no stranger to programming.
I'm working on several indicator projects and EA concepts.
I'm currently studying epistemological degeneracy in financial markets.
I have worked with MQL for just a year now. I pick up programming languages very quickly because I'm no stranger to programming.
I'm working on several indicator projects and EA concepts.
I'm currently studying epistemological degeneracy in financial markets.
Conor Mcnamara
testing my "statistical zigzag" on bitcoin, it's essentially a breakout indicator based on standard deviation volatility
소셜 네트워크에 공유 · 2
Conor Mcnamara
게재된 코드 Statistical Zigzag
변동성 임계값 통과에 따라 새로운 지그재그 전환점을 생성하는 지그재그입니다.
소셜 네트워크에 공유
31
399
Conor Mcnamara
"Until you do what you believe in, you don't know whether you believe it or not."
- Leo Tolstoy
- Leo Tolstoy
Conor Mcnamara
출시돈 제품
Imagine flying a real aircraft without ever stepping into a flight simulator. That's what trading is like. You have to simulate your strategy before you can take it to a live market. It is good if you can simulate things speedily before even stepping into any live market, or before coming up with an automated system. People don't have all day to stare at a higher timeframe chart until the entry signal finally arrives. That's why I built this so that you can simulate your strategy with
Conor Mcnamara
The manual trading simulator is completed, I have nothing more to do on it. It is good I asked in the forum if it was possible to make buttons work in the EA tester...because sometimes there is a solution found by someone, and it saves you from thinking that it might not be possible.
Conor Mcnamara
Keep this is mind when it comes to automated trading:
- An EA that was designed for a particular market style (trending/volatile/ranging) is unlikely to work properly in other market styles with the default setting.
- If a market is choppy, a setting has to be created to account for that, and that takes understanding of technical market dynamics.
The other world of automated trading is quantum/adaptive where it is not trading like a trader anymore and is using complex adaptive algorithms.
It's not fully known if this is more profitable or risky, or whether keeping it simple is more profitable. Simple systems can offer transparency. Complex systems come with validation challenges and opacity.
Personally I see markets as something that alternates primarily because of news and data releases. Both algorithms and manual traders react to that.
If a position is opened by a simple EA, the user must have due diligence and decide if the trade should sit there, or if it should be closed soon based on current news, and not the news that was published at the trade open time.
- An EA that was designed for a particular market style (trending/volatile/ranging) is unlikely to work properly in other market styles with the default setting.
- If a market is choppy, a setting has to be created to account for that, and that takes understanding of technical market dynamics.
The other world of automated trading is quantum/adaptive where it is not trading like a trader anymore and is using complex adaptive algorithms.
It's not fully known if this is more profitable or risky, or whether keeping it simple is more profitable. Simple systems can offer transparency. Complex systems come with validation challenges and opacity.
Personally I see markets as something that alternates primarily because of news and data releases. Both algorithms and manual traders react to that.
If a position is opened by a simple EA, the user must have due diligence and decide if the trade should sit there, or if it should be closed soon based on current news, and not the news that was published at the trade open time.
Conor Mcnamara
The answer is 2, it's still going down.
Because THAT is known as a liquidity trap which traps a lot of novice traders.
Because THAT is known as a liquidity trap which traps a lot of novice traders.
Conor Mcnamara
Trading quiz.
Where do you think the price is going?
1. Support is found, it's going up again
2. Still going down
Where do you think the price is going?
1. Support is found, it's going up again
2. Still going down
Conor Mcnamara
My next project is to create a system that allows you to buy and sell manually in the actual EA strategy tester. I don't even know if this works yet. But I think that if we could test our strategy AT SPEED it would be good.
소셜 네트워크에 공유 · 1
Conor Mcnamara
게재된 코드 Indicator loader for strategy testing
전략 테스터에서 최대 4개의 지표를 동시에 테스트할 수 있는 시스템
소셜 네트워크에 공유
60
363
Conor Mcnamara
게재된 코드 Zigzag Custom Timeframe
LTF 차트에 HTF 지그재그를 표시하는 시간대 입력이 있는 클래식 지그재그입니다.
소셜 네트워크에 공유 · 1
69
393
Conor Mcnamara
게재된 코드 OHLC Candles with extreme tick price tracking
이것은 각각의 새 막대에서 가장 높은 매도 호가와 가장 낮은 매수 호가를 기록하는 OHLC 캔들스틱 차트입니다.
소셜 네트워크에 공유
54
258
Conor Mcnamara
게재된 코드 OHLC Candles with Ask and Bid
매도 호가와 매수 호가를 캔들의 고점과 저점에 연결하는 캔들 차트
소셜 네트워크에 공유 · 1
71
235
Conor Mcnamara
소셜 네트워크에 공유 · 3
Conor Mcnamara
2025.10.11
This was a manual trade. It was a Sell Limit placed at the daily vwap price when the dollar gained strength again. I would say this trade was a bit of luck too to get such a bid price
Conor Mcnamara
게재된 코드 Volatility Step Channel
변동성이 조정된 선으로 로컬 고점과 로컬 저점을 계산하는 채널입니다.
소셜 네트워크에 공유 · 1
57
425
Conor Mcnamara
this was another entry on the VWAP price
the way I see it, whether you buy or sell at this price, there's some profit there eitherway
I am on a demo account performing these tests where I put indicators into live testing
the way I see it, whether you buy or sell at this price, there's some profit there eitherway
I am on a demo account performing these tests where I put indicators into live testing
소셜 네트워크에 공유 · 1
Conor Mcnamara
this entry was the VWAP price at the time I placed the buy limit, it seems like a good indicator to me, and it's downloadable on the codebase
소셜 네트워크에 공유 · 1
Conor Mcnamara
I used to think that from a 10K account and 1:33 leverage, a 1 month profit of 1 - 2K would be very good. But this current strategy is showing much greater alpha in one month.While I know that not every month can be the same, and that one month historical backtest means nothing for the future, it gives me an indication that this strategy has substance if it can show results like that. This is the power of ATR.
소셜 네트워크에 공유 · 1
:
