Sigit Pramono / 프로필
- 정보
|
no
경험
|
3
제품
|
9
데모 버전
|
|
0
작업
|
1
거래 신호
|
0
구독자
|
I’m simply a small independent trader who decided to take a chance on MQL5 by selling the EAs I develop and use myself.
I know that buying an EA from an independent seller requires trust. That is why I use the same EAs I sell on live accounts and share live signals with relatively small capital. It may not be a large account or an impressive amount of capital, but it is real — and I believe real experience is more meaningful than simply making promises.
My hope is that these live results can help reduce some of the uncertainty you may have and give you a clearer picture of how my EAs perform under real market conditions.
**Explore the products below, test them for yourself, and decide which approach fits you best.**
- Valtier Prime: A grid-based EA with 8 independent strategies, built for resilience, adaptability, and long-term account growth.
https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/192558?source=Site+Profile+Seller
- Valtier Pulse: A breakout scalping EA with 2 distinct strategy modes and predefined SL/TP.
No grid, no averaging, no hedging, no martingale — built without high-risk recovery mechanisms.
https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/193658?source=Site+Profile+Seller
>>> Your satisfaction is my happiness. Your trust is my motivation. <<<
Grid vs Non-Grid is a common debate among traders, as if one system must always be better than the other. In my view, both approaches have their own strengths and weaknesses.
Non-Grid systems have the advantage of limiting exposure. When a trade goes wrong, the loss is realized and the system moves on to look for the next opportunity. However, a long losing streak or a change in market conditions can gradually reduce previous profits and may require a longer recovery period.
Grid systems work differently. When price moves against an existing position, the system may add positions according to predefined rules and manage the basket as a whole. This can make the equity curve feel smoother because the system does not immediately realize a loss on every individual position.
However, the trade-off is increased floating exposure and potentially higher drawdown. This is why a grid system depends heavily on sufficient capital, controlled exposure, and disciplined risk management.
So, in my opinion, the real question is not:
“Grid or Non-Grid?”
It is:
“How well can the system manage risk when the market does not behave as expected?”
This is the philosophy behind Valtier Prime.
Valtier Prime is not designed to chase large profits in a short period of time. Its focus is on capital protection, controlled drawdown, and consistent growth.
In my own testing, when the risk level is properly matched to the account size, Valtier Prime has shown the characteristics I am looking for: capital growth while keeping drawdown under control.
As one example, a compounded test starting with $10,000 (Broker: IC Markets, Agresive: ON, Delay: 5ms), from January 2026 to September 12, 2026 produced approximately:
Low Risk: around $9,832 profit nearly 100% growth, with approximately 5.77% DD
Medium Risk: More than 200% growth, with approximately 9.21% DD
(These figures are based on my own backtesting and are not a guarantee of future results. Actual performance can vary depending on market conditions, broker, spreads, execution, and risk settings.)
For me, achieving around 5–10% per month with controlled drawdown is already a very reasonable objective.
If the goal is to generate a larger nominal return, I would personally prefer to increase the capital rather than aggressively increase the risk.
For example, if a system is designed to operate with controlled risk, increasing the account size can increase the potential nominal return without necessarily requiring a higher risk level.
I have also tested Valtier Prime under more extreme conditions. When the risk level is properly matched to the account size and used with discipline, the system has demonstrated the ability to remain within a manageable drawdown range across the conditions I tested.
That is why Valtier Prime is not designed for traders looking to “get rich quickly.”
It is designed for those who understand that in trading:
Survival comes before aggressive growth.
Consistency matters more than chasing extreme returns.
And risk management matters more than simply looking at the win rate.
I also encourage potential users to test the EA themselves with an appropriate account size and risk level before using it on a live account.
If the backtest produces a drawdown significantly higher than expected, don't simply increase the risk. Instead, review the broker, trading conditions, parameters, and market characteristics first.
Because ultimately, the purpose of a trading system is not simply to generate profit.
It is to survive long enough to keep growing.
Valtier Pulse allows you to run two trading modes simultaneously by attaching the EA to different charts and assigning a different Magic Number to each instance.
This allows Mode 1 and Mode 2 to operate independently while running on the same account, giving you the flexibility to combine both trading approaches in a single account.
Backtest Example:
January 1, 2026 – September 8, 2026
Initial Deposit: $100
Mode 1 Risk: 2%
Mode 2 Risk: 2%
Combined Net Profit: $13,713.98
Combined Equity Drawdown Relative: 9.11%
Profit Factor: 5.12
Total Trades: 450
Results shown are based on historical backtesting. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
For more detailed information and product specifications, please visit the product page:
https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/193658?source=Site+Profile+Seller
Live Signal:
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2388875?source=Site+Signals+My
The new Aggressive Mode brings a substantial performance enhancement to Valtier Prime.
Backtest period: January 2025 – September 5, 2026
Initial Deposit: $1,000
In our backtest comparison, Net Profit increased by 81.8%, from $42,078 to $76,506, while the Profit Factor remained above 4.0 and Equity Drawdown remained at a similar level.
Experience the enhanced performance of Valtier Prime V1.3 with Aggressive Mode.
For more detailed information and product specifications, please visit the product page:
https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/192558?source=Site+Profile+Seller
MT5 EA 모니터링 대시보드 MetaTrader 5에서 여러 Expert Advisor를 실행하는 트레이더를 위한 간단하고 가벼운 모니터링 대시보드입니다. 여러 EA가 동일한 계정에서 실행될 경우 각 전략의 성과를 확인하고 추적하는 것이 불편할 수 있습니다. EA Monitoring Dashboard 는 MT5 차트에서 직접 간결한 개요를 제공하여 하나의 대시보드에서 여러 EA의 성과를 모니터링할 수 있도록 합니다. 주요 기능 하나의 대시보드에서 최대 20개의 EA 모니터링 Magic Number 를 사용하여 각 EA 식별 각 EA의 개별 Profit/Loss 표시 설정된 Initial Balance를 기준으로 Growth (%) 표시 모니터링 중인 모든 EA의 Total Profit 표시 모니터링 중인 모든 EA의 Total Growth (%) 표시 Profit, Swap 및 Commission 을 계산에 자동 포함 대시보드가 매초 자동 업데이트 대시보드 위치 및 레이아웃 사용자
- Enhanced Performance for Mode 1 — improved overall trading performance and system efficiency.
- Enhanced Performance for Mode 2 — improved overall trading performance and system efficiency.
For more detailed information and product specifications, please visit the product page:
https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/193658?source=Site+Profile
Valtier Pulse — 시장의 흐름에 맞춰 거래하세요. Valtier Pulse는 높은 변동성의 시장 상황을 위해 특별히 설계된 자동 거래 시스템으로, 역동적인 가격 움직임을 정밀성, 일관성 및 통제된 실행 방식으로 대응할 수 있도록 구축되었습니다. 특별 출시 가격: $125. 다음 가격은 $249 실계좌 시그널 Key Features 완전 자동 거래 — 진입부터 거래 관리까지 수동 조작 없이 운영됩니다. Pending Stop Entries — 감지된 시장 상황을 기반으로 Buy Stop 또는 Sell Stop 설정을 자동으로 실행합니다. 다양한 거래 모드 — Mode 1, Mode 2 및 Custom과 같은 다양한 사전 정의 거래 프로필을 포함합니다. 유연한 리스크 관리 — 선택한 리스크 비율에 따른 자동 랏 사이징 또는 고정 랏 사이징을 지원합니다. Pending Without SL/TP — 브로커 측에 SL/TP를 설정하지 않고 Pending Order를 배치할 수 있는
Valtier Prime MT5 Valtier Prime은 XAUUSD 전용으로 설계된 전문 자동 트레이딩 시스템으로, 여러 트레이딩 전략과 통합 거래 및 리스크 관리를 결합합니다. 그리드 기반 시스템인 Prime은 공격적인 단기 수익보다는 자본 보호, 통제된 리스크, 규율 있는 트레이딩 및 지속 가능한 장기 성장에 중점을 둡니다. 특별 가격: $125. 10건 판매될 때마다 가격이 $125씩 인상됩니다. 최종 가격: $999. KEY FEATURES 멀티 전략 트레이딩 시스템 자동 거래 및 포지션 관리 통합 리스크 관리 각 전략별 통제된 그리드 시스템 드로다운 보호 FOMC & NFP 트레이딩 필터 다층 뉴스 보호 자동 포지션 사이징 공격적 모드 — 추가 드로다운을 비교적 통제된 수준으로 유지하면서 수익 잠재력을 크게 높이도록 설계되었습니다. RECOMMENDED SETUP Symbol: XAUUSD Timeframe: M5 권장 최소 잔고 요건은 선택한 리스크 수준에 따라


