Regarding the limitation by financial value ($), related to "Loss limit in $" and "Profit limit in $", there could be another parameter to establish whether the limitation will be on a daily, weekly or monthly basis. Please consider implementing this improvement.
As it was implemented in this version 1.0, it is necessary to keep modifying this parameter depending on the account balance, whenever the graphs are closed.
Regarding the limitation by financial value ($), related to "Loss limit in $" and "Profit limit in $", there could be another parameter to establish whether the limitation will be on a daily, weekly or monthly basis. Please consider implementing this improvement.
As it was implemented in this version 1.0, it is necessary to keep modifying this parameter depending on the account balance, whenever the graphs are closed.
I don’t quite understand, please clarify what you mean. You want to have daily/weekly/monthly loss control, right?
Regarding the limitation by financial value ($), related to "Loss limit in $" and "Profit limit in $", there could be another parameter to establish whether the limitation will be on a daily, weekly or monthly basis. Please consider implementing this improvement.
As it was implemented in this version 1.0, it is necessary to keep modifying this parameter depending on the account balance, whenever the graphs are closed.
Regarding the limitation by financial value ($), related to "Loss limit in $" and "Profit limit in $", there could be another parameter to establish whether the limitation will be on a daily, weekly or monthly basis. Please consider implementing this improvement.
As it was implemented in this version 1.0, it is necessary to keep modifying this parameter depending on the account balance, whenever the graphs are closed.
I don’t quite understand, please clarify what you mean. You want to have daily/weekly/monthly loss control, right?
I don’t quite understand, please clarify what you mean. You want to have daily/weekly/monthly loss control, right?
Yes.
Yes.
I already gave this answer to your review, you may not have noticed. I answered here