Unfortunately, it doesn't do so well in the back test
You only tested one pair and for a relatively short period. A test of just over a year does not say anything about a product that is intended to be used for decades. Also, you have only tested one pair, currently the system operates with 4 forex pairs and we are working so that you can work with an increasing number of assets.
You only tested one pair and for a relatively short period. A test of just over a year does not say anything about a product that is intended to be used for decades. Also, you have only tested one pair, currently the system operates with 4 forex pairs and we are working so that you can work with an increasing number of assets.
haha don't be unprofessional. one year of testing should work well for an EA. if you cannot make a good EA just admit your product is no good and work on it until it improves. but you obviously subscribe to your own B.S. and believe you are the master of the EA universe. you like those fake kung fu masters on youtube- good for just one thing, a laugh!
deagrellac #: haha don't be unprofessional. one year of testing should work well for an EA. if you cannot make a good EA just admit your product is no good and work on it until it improves. but you obviously subscribe to your own B.S. and believe you are the master of the EA universe. you like those fake kung fu masters on youtube- good for just one thing, a laugh!
to some degree that depends on the goal of the EA. If it is made for long term growth, a one year backtest won't tell you much. Granted, most people are looking for profit on smaller time frame, understandably, as am I.
Para estar poniéndolo gratis para después pedir un precio por este producto es uno mas del montón se va a perdida en cualquier momento en cualquier par y en cualquier temporalidad como dije es uno más del montón hay mejores y full gratis,
UN PRODUCTO MÁS DEL MONTÓN INSERVIBLE QUE COMO OTROS A LA FINAL SALES EN PERDIDA
Unfortunately, it doesn't do so well in the back test
Unfortunately, it doesn't do so well in the back test
You only tested one pair and for a relatively short period. A test of just over a year does not say anything about a product that is intended to be used for decades. Also, you have only tested one pair, currently the system operates with 4 forex pairs and we are working so that you can work with an increasing number of assets.
Any question, you can ask me on Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/e2UUCYsd87E1ZTI5
You only tested one pair and for a relatively short period. A test of just over a year does not say anything about a product that is intended to be used for decades. Also, you have only tested one pair, currently the system operates with 4 forex pairs and we are working so that you can work with an increasing number of assets.
Your modelling quality showing 25% thus your back-test results were not reliable. Try to post some screenshots with at least 90% modelling quality.
Here you can see 10 years backtests on XAUUSD, USDJPY, GBPUSD and AUDUSD.
Any question, you can ask me on Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/e2UUCYsd87E1ZTI5
Your modelling quality showing 25% thus your back-test results were not reliable. Try to post some screenshots with at least 90% modelling quality.
The tests with 25% MQ were the first I did. Then I did 99.9% tests, which are in the product description: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/73586
haha don't be unprofessional. one year of testing should work well for an EA. if you cannot make a good EA just admit your product is no good and work on it until it improves. but you obviously subscribe to your own B.S. and believe you are the master of the EA universe. you like those fake kung fu masters on youtube- good for just one thing, a laugh!
Para estar poniéndolo gratis para después pedir un precio por este producto es uno mas del montón se va a perdida en cualquier momento en cualquier par y en cualquier temporalidad como dije es uno más del montón hay mejores y full gratis,
UN PRODUCTO MÁS DEL MONTÓN INSERVIBLE QUE COMO OTROS A LA FINAL SALES EN PERDIDA