All default settings are for brokers with GMT + 2 time ( ManualTimeOffsetGMT = 2 ). If your broker's time zone is different from GMT + 2, you should make a time zone offset in the settings. The article describes how to do it - https://www.mql5.com/en/blogs/post/685288
I'm constantly working on improving this robot, I'm constantly looking for new pairs for trading.If there are wishes and suggestions, please contact in a personal mail.
Все настройки по умолчанию - для брокеров со временем GMT+2 (ManualTimeOffsetGMT = 2). Если часовой пояс вашего брокера отличается от GMT+2, вам следует произвести смещение часового пояса в настройках. В статье рассказывается как это сделать - https://www.mql5.com/ru/blogs/post/685288 (на английском).
Я постоянно работаю над улучшением данного робота, постоянно ищу новые инструменты для торговли. Если будут пожелания и предложения, обращайтесь в личку.
i downloaded a demo and your EA seems really promising with a random set that i did use. can you please share with us the Sets that you are using?
Thank you
Hello,
Thanks for asking.I think it will be useful to many. To begin with, I would recommend that you use the default settings.They are suitable for most cases.All my tests were done with the default settings.But notice that it is not necessary to find out the GMT Offset of your broker.How to do it, you can read here.
We all have a different style of trading.And different expectations from the market.If the default settings do not suit you, you can easily customize this robot for your trading style.
на сигнале происходит постоянное пополнение - для скрывания просадки, а на скрина видна минимальная просадка.
Добрый день, судя по вашему высказанному ошибочному мнению, вы плохо разбираетесь в сигналах. Если я просто буду пополнять или снимать со счета денег, показатели счета не изменяться. Считается только реальные ордера. И да, данный счет является ПАММ счетом, то что вы называли "пополнением", это люди вкладывают в данным ПАММ и а снятие денег, как правильно со счета снимается процент за управление счетом.
К тому же примерно до половины счета, стояли старые настройки, когда настройки поменялись, можно видеть по более прямой линии.
Terrible EA! I test with TDS 2.0 99% modelling default settings and SL is too wide and kills the stats of the EA with very large losses compared to small wins. See full backtest report attached. If there is a set with other smaller tolerable SL please post or PM and I will retest.
Terrible EA! I test with TDS 2.0 99% modelling default settings and SL is too wide and kills the stats of the EA with very large losses compared to small wins. See full backtest report attached. If there is a set with other smaller tolerable SL please post or PM and I will retest.
EIRUSD is not the best pair for this EA!
At the moment, EA supports 21 pairs. For an example, try backtesting on other tools:EURCHF, GBPUSD, CADCHF, CHFJPY, EURCAD, GBPCHF, GBPCAD, GBPAUD
Then I recommend to delete the EURUSD and other pairs that are not good from the list of recommended pairs. Leave only the few that are ok. I will post a 99% backtest with one of the recommended pairs.
Here is the EURCHF M1 backtest report. I still don't recommend the EA for live trading since the RR ratio is 17:1 when it should be no more than 2.5:1. I recommend to rewrite the logic of the EA (and a preset update) to accommodate for a much smaller SL that will not destroy the account balance when hit. In this case the SL should not lose more than 0.84 (avg win) x 2.5 = $2.10 MAX and not $14.12!
Then I recommend to delete the EURUSD and other pairs that are not good from the list of recommended pairs. Leave only the few that are ok. I will post a 99% backtest with one of the recommended pairs.
You correctly say, but the fact is that on some brokers, there is a very narrow spread, and traders asked to add this pair.In addition, you can always set the necessary settings for this pair, and choose the best settings for your trading style.
Here is the EURCHF M1 backtest report. I still don't recommend the EA for live trading since the RR ratio is 17:1 when it should be no more than 2.5:1. I recommend to rewrite the logic of the EA (and a preset update) to accommodate for a much smaller SL that will not destroy the account balance when hit. In this case the SL should not lose more than 0.84 (avg win) x 2.5 = $2.10 MAX and not $14.12!
Thank you for your work!But let me note some inaccuracies!
This is not a correct comparison.You compare different values from different significative. You compare the average value with the maximum value, is not correct.Why are you doing this?
Thank you for your work!But let me note some inaccuracies!
This is not a correct comparison.You compare different values from different significative. You compare the average value with the maximum value, is not correct.Why are you doing this?
And please ask what spread you made this report.
When you lose an SL in worst case it is Largest SL and this is how professionally you need to calculate it (not with average loss). I use default DukasCopy ECN spread for EURCHF. If you have different preset with smaller SL post it and I can retest. I recommend you read about proper implementation of Money Management so that you understand the reason for using Largest SL in RR calculation.
When you lose an SL in worst case it is Largest SL and this is how professionally you need to calculate it (not with average loss). I use default DukasCopy ECN spread for EURCHF. If you have different preset with smaller SL post it and I can retest.
Let me disagree with you.To calculate the stability of the system, you need to compare the Identical value.If you, take in maximum loss, then need take in maximum profit.
In addition, look at how the maximum loss differs from the average loss.Perhaps this is an isolated case, or a gap in quotes, and for example was 1 time in 5 years, tester does not show this.This is not an indicator, you must agree!
Also, you do not take into ratio of the percent of profit orders, this also affects the positive result.
Let me disagree with you.To calculate the stability of the system, you need to compare the Identical value.If you, take in maximum loss, then need take in maximum profit.
In addition, look at how the maximum loss differs from the average loss.Perhaps this is an isolated case, or a gap in quotes, and for example was 1 time in 5 years, tester does not show this.This is not an indicator, you must agree!
Also, you do not take into ratio of the percent of profit orders, this also affects the positive result.
Look -- you can manipulate the backtest stats to show you what you want so you can sell many copies of the EA. But the reality is if you have a $100 balance in your account and you lose -- you will take the $14 SL loss. You now have $86 left. You keep making $0.84 every time you win so it will take you about 17 wins to make up for the loss. You want to trade live with this kind of EA? Be my guest.. I will not jeopardize my account balance with such things. 'Prepare for the Worst and hope for the Best'. Remember this especially for trading. There are no GAPS in Dukascopy data since it is tick data. Always test with TDS and not Tickstory because Tickstory is not accurate. Enough time spent on this.. I will not buy this EA like this so if you have decided no improvement is necessary then it makes sense to look somewhere else.
Look -- you can manipulate the backtest stats to show you what you want so you can sell many copies of the EA. But the reality is if you have a $100 balance in your account and you lose -- you will take the $14 SL loss. You now have $86 left. You keep making $0.84 every time you win so it will take you about 17 wins to make up for the loss. You want to trade live with this kind of EA? Be my guest.. I will not jeopardize my account balance with such things. 'Prepare for the Worst and hope for the Best'. Remember this especially for trading. There are no GAPS in Dukascopy data since it is tick data. Always test with TDS and not Tickstory because Tickstory is not accurate. Enough time spent on this.. I will not buy this EA like this so if you have decided no improvement is necessary then it makes sense to look somewhere else.
How can you draw conclusions without plunging into the details?This indicates your low competence.In addition, I do not see testing on other pairs.
You try to manipulate the opinions of others, through the manipulation of facts.You compare the values convenient for your theory.At the same time, you did not answer the question how many times there was a maximum loss on history. I do not force you to buy this robot, and did not ask for your opinion.You yourself decided to write a review, not always possessing worthy сompetence.Your opinion is subjective. And besides, you forgot about live monitoring account, where 260% of the profit.You are made-to-order hater.
How can you draw conclusions without plunging into the details?This indicates your low competence.In addition, I do not see testing on other pairs.
You try to manipulate the opinions of others, through the manipulation of facts.You compare the values convenient for your theory.At the same time, you did not answer the question how many times there was a maximum loss on history. I do not force you to buy this robot, and did not ask for your opinion.You yourself decided to write a review, not always possessing worthy сompetence.Your opinion is subjective. And besides, you forgot about live monitoring account, where 260% of the profit.You are made-to-order hater.
You are the one resorting to insults because this is the only defense that you have. I feel sorry for you and sorry for people that buy this EA and will lose money with it. Live account monitoring is in a nosedive for few months. So what is so exciting about it? It does not matter how many times the worst SL was hit -- rest assured it will hit again many many times if the Money Management is poor. I tested the next pair on the good list the EURCHF.. what other testing did you want? The RR ratio is horrible across all pairs due to the poor logic of the EA. I will go on record here and predict that this EA will make some profit from time to time but it will give it all back and more with the large SL being hit.
You are the one resorting to insults because this is the only defense that you have. I feel sorry for you and sorry for people that buy this EA and will lose money with it. Live account monitoring is in a nosedive for few months. So what is so exciting about it? It does not matter how many times the worst SL was hit -- rest assured it will hit again many many times if the Money Management is poor. I tested the next pair on the good list the EURCHF.. what other testing did you want? The RR ratio is horrible across all pairs due to the poor logic of the EA. I will go on record here and predict that this EA will make some profit from time to time but it will give it all back and more with the large SL being hit.
When you lose an SL in worst case it is Largest SL and this is how professionally you need to calculate it (not with average loss). I use default DukasCopy ECN spread for EURCHF. If you have different preset with smaller SL post it and I can retest. I recommend you read about proper implementation of Money Management so that you understand the reason for using Largest SL in RR calculation.
I agree with traderfx13. This EA is not reliable, uses among other things SL very broad, is the old formula to have more hit rate, but the operations last days for a small profit. If an operation falls in the SL, the loss will be enormous, corresponding to more than 15 transactions. Much risk well presented.
It does not give confidence to register, does not give confidence to put a photo of a woman, how old is the programmer? because that is from small children
And stop spamming the MQL chat or you'll have to report it.
If this EA works as shown by the catch, do not come, make yourself rich. This is naive, even the image of the EA is a woman. Let me tell you that we are not so slimy as to fall into these traps, that I am already 46 years old and I only see this as something done by a crazy young man.
I agree with traderfx13. This EA is not reliable, uses among other things SL very broad, is the old formula to have more hit rate, but the operations last days for a small profit. If an operation falls in the SL, the loss will be enormous, corresponding to more than 15 transactions. Much risk well presented.
It does not give confidence to register, does not give confidence to put a photo of a woman, how old is the programmer? because that is from small children
And stop spamming the MQL chat or you'll have to report it.
If this EA works as shown by the catch, do not come, make yourself rich. This is naive, even the image of the EA is a woman. Let me tell you that we are not so slimy as to fall into these traps, that I am already 46 years old and I only see this as something done by a crazy young man.
Man, I couldn't have said it better! Where were you when I was blasting away on those other comments?! ;)
Welcome to the Salva System EA page. Advisor Salva EA is already set to work - just select a couple and the level of risk!
Salva EA works best on the following pairs with the default settings:
EURCHF, GBPUSD, CHFJPY, GBPCAD, GBPAUD, USDCHF, CADCHF, NZDJPY, AUDCHF, GBPCHF, USDJPY, EURGBP, AUDIAD, EURCAD, EURJPY, EURAUD, CADJPY, USDCAD, AUDZD, EURUSD, NZDUSD
Work schedule: M1 or M5
All default settings are for brokers with GMT + 2 time ( ManualTimeOffsetGMT = 2 ). If your broker's time zone is different from GMT + 2, you should make a time zone offset in the settings. The article describes how to do it - https://www.mql5.com/en/blogs/post/685288
I'm constantly working on improving this robot, I'm constantly looking for new pairs for trading. If there are wishes and suggestions, please contact in a personal mail.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Добро пожаловать на страничку обсуждения Salva System EA. Советник Salva EA уже настроен на работу - просто выберите пару и уровень риска!
Salva EA наиболее хорошо работает на следующих парах с настройками по умолчанию:
EURCHF, GBPUSD, CHFJPY, GBPCAD, GBPAUD, USDCHF, CADCHF, NZDJPY, AUDCHF, GBPCHF, USDJPY, EURGBP, AUDCAD, EURCAD, EURJPY, EURAUD, CADJPY, USDCAD, AUDNZD, EURUSD, NZDUSD
Рабочий график: M1 или M5
Все настройки по умолчанию - для брокеров со временем GMT+2 (ManualTimeOffsetGMT = 2). Если часовой пояс вашего брокера отличается от GMT+2, вам следует произвести смещение часового пояса в настройках. В статье рассказывается как это сделать - https://www.mql5.com/ru/blogs/post/685288 (на английском).
Я постоянно работаю над улучшением данного робота, постоянно ищу новые инструменты для торговли. Если будут пожелания и предложения, обращайтесь в личку.
------------------
Some backtests with default settings:
Hello Pavel,
i downloaded a demo and your EA seems really promising with a random set that i did use. can you please share with us the Sets that you are using?
Thank you
Hello Pavel,
i downloaded a demo and your EA seems really promising with a random set that i did use. can you please share with us the Sets that you are using?
Thank you
Hello,
Thanks for asking. I think it will be useful to many.
To begin with, I would recommend that you use the default settings. They are suitable for most cases. All my tests were done with the default settings. But notice that it is not necessary to find out the GMT Offset of your broker. How to do it, you can read here.
We all have a different style of trading. And different expectations from the market. If the default settings do not suit you, you can easily customize this robot for your trading style.
Судя по Вашему сигналу - и скриов которые здесь.
очень разные результаты.
на сигнале происходит постоянное пополнение - для скрывания просадки, а на скрина видна минимальная просадка.
Судя по Вашему сигналу - и скриов которые здесь.
очень разные результаты.
на сигнале происходит постоянное пополнение - для скрывания просадки, а на скрина видна минимальная просадка.
Добрый день, судя по вашему высказанному ошибочному мнению, вы плохо разбираетесь в сигналах. Если я просто буду пополнять или снимать со счета денег, показатели счета не изменяться. Считается только реальные ордера. И да, данный счет является ПАММ счетом, то что вы называли "пополнением", это люди вкладывают в данным ПАММ и а снятие денег, как правильно со счета снимается процент за управление счетом.
К тому же примерно до половины счета, стояли старые настройки, когда настройки поменялись, можно видеть по более прямой линии.
Terrible EA! I test with TDS 2.0 99% modelling default settings and SL is too wide and kills the stats of the EA with very large losses compared to small wins. See full backtest report attached. If there is a set with other smaller tolerable SL please post or PM and I will retest.
Terrible EA! I test with TDS 2.0 99% modelling default settings and SL is too wide and kills the stats of the EA with very large losses compared to small wins. See full backtest report attached. If there is a set with other smaller tolerable SL please post or PM and I will retest.
At the moment, EA supports 21 pairs.
For an example, try backtesting on other tools: EURCHF, GBPUSD, CADCHF, CHFJPY, EURCAD, GBPCHF, GBPCAD, GBPAUD
Then I recommend to delete the EURUSD and other pairs that are not good from the list of recommended pairs. Leave only the few that are ok. I will post a 99% backtest with one of the recommended pairs.
Here is the EURCHF M1 backtest report. I still don't recommend the EA for live trading since the RR ratio is 17:1 when it should be no more than 2.5:1. I recommend to rewrite the logic of the EA (and a preset update) to accommodate for a much smaller SL that will not destroy the account balance when hit. In this case the SL should not lose more than 0.84 (avg win) x 2.5 = $2.10 MAX and not $14.12!
Then I recommend to delete the EURUSD and other pairs that are not good from the list of recommended pairs. Leave only the few that are ok. I will post a 99% backtest with one of the recommended pairs.
You correctly say, but the fact is that on some brokers, there is a very narrow spread, and traders asked to add this pair. In addition, you can always set the necessary settings for this pair, and choose the best settings for your trading style.
Here is the EURCHF M1 backtest report. I still don't recommend the EA for live trading since the RR ratio is 17:1 when it should be no more than 2.5:1. I recommend to rewrite the logic of the EA (and a preset update) to accommodate for a much smaller SL that will not destroy the account balance when hit. In this case the SL should not lose more than 0.84 (avg win) x 2.5 = $2.10 MAX and not $14.12!
This is not a correct comparison. You compare different values from different significative. You compare the average value with the maximum value, is not correct. Why are you doing this?
And please ask what spread you made this report.
This is not a correct comparison. You compare different values from different significative. You compare the average value with the maximum value, is not correct. Why are you doing this?
And please ask what spread you made this report.
When you lose an SL in worst case it is Largest SL and this is how professionally you need to calculate it (not with average loss). I use default DukasCopy ECN spread for EURCHF. If you have different preset with smaller SL post it and I can retest. I recommend you read about proper implementation of Money Management so that you understand the reason for using Largest SL in RR calculation.
When you lose an SL in worst case it is Largest SL and this is how professionally you need to calculate it (not with average loss). I use default DukasCopy ECN spread for EURCHF. If you have different preset with smaller SL post it and I can retest.
Let me disagree with you. To calculate the stability of the system, you need to compare the Identical value. If you, take in maximum loss, then need take in maximum profit.
In addition, look at how the maximum loss differs from the average loss. Perhaps this is an isolated case, or a gap in quotes, and for example was 1 time in 5 years, tester does not show this. This is not an indicator, you must agree!
Also, you do not take into ratio of the percent of profit orders, this also affects the positive result.
Let me disagree with you. To calculate the stability of the system, you need to compare the Identical value. If you, take in maximum loss, then need take in maximum profit.
In addition, look at how the maximum loss differs from the average loss. Perhaps this is an isolated case, or a gap in quotes, and for example was 1 time in 5 years, tester does not show this. This is not an indicator, you must agree!
Also, you do not take into ratio of the percent of profit orders, this also affects the positive result.
Look -- you can manipulate the backtest stats to show you what you want so you can sell many copies of the EA. But the reality is if you have a $100 balance in your account and you lose -- you will take the $14 SL loss. You now have $86 left. You keep making $0.84 every time you win so it will take you about 17 wins to make up for the loss. You want to trade live with this kind of EA? Be my guest.. I will not jeopardize my account balance with such things. 'Prepare for the Worst and hope for the Best'. Remember this especially for trading. There are no GAPS in Dukascopy data since it is tick data. Always test with TDS and not Tickstory because Tickstory is not accurate. Enough time spent on this.. I will not buy this EA like this so if you have decided no improvement is necessary then it makes sense to look somewhere else.
Look -- you can manipulate the backtest stats to show you what you want so you can sell many copies of the EA. But the reality is if you have a $100 balance in your account and you lose -- you will take the $14 SL loss. You now have $86 left. You keep making $0.84 every time you win so it will take you about 17 wins to make up for the loss. You want to trade live with this kind of EA? Be my guest.. I will not jeopardize my account balance with such things. 'Prepare for the Worst and hope for the Best'. Remember this especially for trading. There are no GAPS in Dukascopy data since it is tick data. Always test with TDS and not Tickstory because Tickstory is not accurate. Enough time spent on this.. I will not buy this EA like this so if you have decided no improvement is necessary then it makes sense to look somewhere else.
How can you draw conclusions without plunging into the details? This indicates your low competence. In addition, I do not see testing on other pairs.
You try to manipulate the opinions of others, through the manipulation of facts. You compare the values convenient for your theory. At the same time, you did not answer the question how many times there was a maximum loss on history.
I do not force you to buy this robot, and did not ask for your opinion. You yourself decided to write a review, not always possessing worthy сompetence. Your opinion is subjective.
And besides, you forgot about live monitoring account, where 260% of the profit. You are made-to-order hater.
How can you draw conclusions without plunging into the details? This indicates your low competence. In addition, I do not see testing on other pairs.
You try to manipulate the opinions of others, through the manipulation of facts. You compare the values convenient for your theory. At the same time, you did not answer the question how many times there was a maximum loss on history.
I do not force you to buy this robot, and did not ask for your opinion. You yourself decided to write a review, not always possessing worthy сompetence. Your opinion is subjective.
And besides, you forgot about live monitoring account, where 260% of the profit. You are made-to-order hater.
You are the one resorting to insults because this is the only defense that you have. I feel sorry for you and sorry for people that buy this EA and will lose money with it. Live account monitoring is in a nosedive for few months. So what is so exciting about it? It does not matter how many times the worst SL was hit -- rest assured it will hit again many many times if the Money Management is poor. I tested the next pair on the good list the EURCHF.. what other testing did you want? The RR ratio is horrible across all pairs due to the poor logic of the EA. I will go on record here and predict that this EA will make some profit from time to time but it will give it all back and more with the large SL being hit.
You are the one resorting to insults because this is the only defense that you have. I feel sorry for you and sorry for people that buy this EA and will lose money with it. Live account monitoring is in a nosedive for few months. So what is so exciting about it? It does not matter how many times the worst SL was hit -- rest assured it will hit again many many times if the Money Management is poor. I tested the next pair on the good list the EURCHF.. what other testing did you want? The RR ratio is horrible across all pairs due to the poor logic of the EA. I will go on record here and predict that this EA will make some profit from time to time but it will give it all back and more with the large SL being hit.
When you lose an SL in worst case it is Largest SL and this is how professionally you need to calculate it (not with average loss). I use default DukasCopy ECN spread for EURCHF. If you have different preset with smaller SL post it and I can retest. I recommend you read about proper implementation of Money Management so that you understand the reason for using Largest SL in RR calculation.
I agree with traderfx13. This EA is not reliable, uses among other things SL very broad, is the old formula to have more hit rate, but the operations last days for a small profit. If an operation falls in the SL, the loss will be enormous, corresponding to more than 15 transactions. Much risk well presented.
It does not give confidence to register, does not give confidence to put a photo of a woman, how old is the programmer? because that is from small children
And stop spamming the MQL chat or you'll have to report it.
If this EA works as shown by the catch, do not come, make yourself rich. This is naive, even the image of the EA is a woman. Let me tell you that we are not so slimy as to fall into these traps, that I am already 46 years old and I only see this as something done by a crazy young man.
I agree with traderfx13. This EA is not reliable, uses among other things SL very broad, is the old formula to have more hit rate, but the operations last days for a small profit. If an operation falls in the SL, the loss will be enormous, corresponding to more than 15 transactions. Much risk well presented.
It does not give confidence to register, does not give confidence to put a photo of a woman, how old is the programmer? because that is from small children
And stop spamming the MQL chat or you'll have to report it.
If this EA works as shown by the catch, do not come, make yourself rich. This is naive, even the image of the EA is a woman. Let me tell you that we are not so slimy as to fall into these traps, that I am already 46 years old and I only see this as something done by a crazy young man.