Hi Alfiya,

I entered 4 similar orders with SL/TP/Br/PC/Tr. 3 of them executed and closed properly but 1 didn't. On the 1 only the first Br Even executed but other functions didn't work, screenshot attached. Can you please take a look and see what went wrong.

Hello,

1) all trading events (successful and unsuccessful) are recorded by the panel on the Expert tab of the terminal. If the price touched the level and the panel was enabled at that moment, then there will be a record there.

2) I don't see from the pictures when these functions were installed, and I don't see that the price touched these levels. If you show such errors, then show them at the moment when the price touched the levels, and preferably show them on video.

Этот параметр у меня включен, также при частичном закрытии у меня включен параметр мультивалютный режим, как я понял при его активации при изменении размера стопа не влияет на расчет размера тейк профита и он расчитывается с первоначальных значений стоп лосса. Я проверял это работает.

Подскажите  где найти вкладку эксперт, у меня в навигаторе их несколько и при попытке открытия  задается вапрос вы хотите добавить Expert ))) в местоTradePanel, я наверное не там ищу)

Это находиться здесь:

Событие ищем по времени, если событие было не сегодня, то кликаем по списку правой кнопкой мыши и выбираем из контекстного меню Просмотр или Открыть.

Добрый вечер. У меня из раза в раз повторяется не запланированное закрытие тейка)) В вкладке Эксперт видно , что ордер срабатывает от TradePanel но настойки автоматического частичного закрытия берутся от другого инструмента YUMC в случае частичного закрытия ТGTX, в случае с AAPL тоже закрывает частично TradePanel, может у меня что то не корректно с настройками частичного закрытия ордеров, может можно как то сбросить настройки которые остались в памяти TradePanel ? Скрины прилагаю.

Thanks, next time if there is problem I will send you pictures with price marked.

Cheers

Здравствуйте, сбрасывать ничего не нужно, 

Если смотреть вторую картинку (AAPL), то там действительно дистанция и объем совершённого частичного закрытия не совпадают с настройками которые у вас на панели.

Если вы работаете на двух символах, и вам нужно применять разные настройки частичного закрытия для этих символов, то вам нужно включить этот чекбокс:

Эта дополнительная галочка предусмотрена для удобства, например,

у вас 5 символов,

- для символа 1, 2, 3 - вы хотите применять одинаковые настройки частичного закрытия. Соответственное переключаясь на символ  1, 2, 3 вы не устанавливаете эту галочку. Эти три символа будут иметь одинаковые настройки, при этом меняя настройки на одном символе, вы автоматически меняете настройки на двух остальных.

- для 4, 5 - вы хотите применять индивидуальные настройки частичного закрытия. Соответственное для символов  4,5 должны быть установлены эти галочки.  Эти два символа будут сохранять свои настройки отдельно.

Если я правильно понял  для 4 и 5 символа я поставлю галочку только для AAPL, при настройках частичного закрытия как на скрине выше то все должно работать корректно и первый тейк профит у меня должен закрыться с обьемом 80% 3к1.

Буду тестировать. Отпишусь если что-то пойдет не так как нужно.

Да, все верно. Установите эту галочку у всех символов. 

Hi Alfiya,

I need a risk control that not more than 4 trades can be executed within 1 hour starting from the time first trade is executed. I am hoping I can get a script written for this. Will such script work with Trade Panel. I am not sure if I can ask you to do it for me you must be a very busy person.

Thanks.

Hi Alfiya

i was playing around with the grid option

and i noticed that it does not correctly calculate the total risk i show you some examples

what i did is put 2 orders total so 1 master and 1 grid 

the grid order sould be places at 50% distance of the SL risk is 1% test account is 92k so risk is 920 dollar

before you place the order it shows this see screenshot

you see it is 920 dollar risk 1% of 92K

but when you place the order 

and calculate the risk of both orders together it is lower then 1%

look screenshot first order is at entry price so half the risk so 460 dollar risk

2nd order is at 50% distance to SL 

sould also be 460 risk but it is not

see screenshot

only 229.22 dollars 

total is that 460 + 229.22= 689.22

i think this option is oke but 

but maybe an option for Total risk the same as intended so then the 2nd order sould get bigger because it is closer to the SL

i hope you understand

Greets

Gert

Hello Alfiya,

Does it make any difference in running Trade Panel if I have VPS or not? I subscribed and installed VPS but my trades still get executed at my local network speed. I enter all orders, including pending orders, manually.

Thanks.

Hello, I will write this down in the list. But I will say right away that I will consider such functionality only if there is a request for it from many users of the panel.

Hello,

You need to look at this differently.

In the settings, you set up to open two orders, and distribute the calculated Volume equally between these orders. Note, not the risk, but the Volume.

Next, you open a grid of orders with a calculated volume of 3.14.

The panel opens two orders and distributes the volume of 3.14 equally between these two orders. Accordingly, each order receives a volume of 1.57.

Why is the loss on the second order less than on the first? - everything is simple here, the second order has a stop loss less than the second, accordingly, the second order will receive less loss when closed by stop loss.

Regarding VPS.

1) VPS from mql5.com will not work with the panel, since this VPS does not support working with the interface.

2) On other VPSs, where there is a desktop, and on which you install the panel, the application will work the same way as on your home computer.

3) You open an order from a home computer and from the VPS, where the order will be opened faster, - this depends on many factors, and first of all on the distance of the computer to the Broker server.

4) the installed panel on the VPS and the installed panel on your computer are not connected in any way, they work independently of each other. This means that if you change the settings on the panel that is installed on your computer, this action will not change the settings of the panel that is installed on your VPS.

Hi Alfiya,

I understand, and I did explain this earlier, but the thing is, I set the TP Risk menu to 1% risk, yet it's still coming out to be less than that.

Let me explain in more detail what I’m doing:

I’m taking on challenges for prop firms—not one big challenge, but rather five smaller ones to spread the risk. I take a 1.5% risk during Phase 1 of each challenge, and every time I find a new setup, I switch to the next account, one of the five.

Most prop firms have an 8% target for Phase 1 and a 5% target for Phase 2. So, if I risk 1.5% in Phase 1 with a risk-reward ratio of around 1:3, on a $10k account, that’s $150 risked, but the gain is three times that, or $450.

To pass Phase 1, I need to make $800. So, in two successful trades, I’ve made more than 8% and Phase 1 is done. If not, I only risk 1.5% again, and when I get back to that account, I do the same—risk 1.5% to gain three times more.

Phase 2 is faster. Once I’ve passed Phase 1 on all the challenges, I move to Phase 2, but I wait until I have all five ready so I can switch accounts whenever I have a setup.

In Phase 2, I risk 1.75%. I only need 5% to pass, so for a $10k account, that’s $500. I risk $175, but if I win, I gain three times that—$525. So, in one trade, I pass Phase 2, get a funded account, and then I go back to a 1% risk for real.

Now you understand why I want the specific risk I asked for.

As for why I want to place two orders instead of one:

My system is based on ICT, so I mostly look for displacement, FVGs, IFVGs, and things like that. The thing is, when I place an order at the top of the FVG, for example, the market often goes a bit deeper. That’s why I got the idea to place two orders: one at the top of the FVG and another 50% lower.

If only one order gets hit, okay, less profit but still profit. If both orders get hit, even better—more profit, a better combined price, and a bit less risk than I initially intended.

I’ve already adjusted the risk a bit to account for the second order being at a better price.

It's okay for now; I was just asking.

Hopefully, you now understand why I want to pass these challenges quickly.

Best regards,
Gert

Yes, I understand, it would be better if the panel could distribute risks. Implementing this in code is a difficult task, at the moment I am not ready to implement such functionality. Perhaps in the future I will try to add it.

If I get EA/Script from a developer for risk control will it work with the Trade Panel? I am planning to get one for the following-

1. Limit max trades to 4/Hour

2. Limit SL on open orders/trades to max 40% of balance

I don't know, it depends on how your developer will implement the algorithm of his program.