Vortex Nomad Aegis AI
329.99 USD
Versione demo scaricata:
6
Pubblicato:
12 dicembre 2025
Versione attuale:
1.0
Non hai trovato un robot adatto?
Ordina il tuo
su Freelance
Vai alla sezione Freelance
Ordina il tuo
su Freelance
Come acquistare un Robot di Trading o un indicatore
Esegui il tuo EA
hosting virtuale
hosting virtuale
Prova un indicatore/robot di trading prima di acquistarlo
Vuoi guadagnare nel Market?
Come presentare un prodotto per venderlo con successo
Ti stai perdendo delle opportunità di trading:
- App di trading gratuite
- Oltre 8.000 segnali per il copy trading
- Notizie economiche per esplorare i mercati finanziari
Registrazione
Accedi
Accetti la politica del sito e le condizioni d’uso
Se non hai un account, registrati

Profit of the day by using this amazin
It looks like this
I'm not sure if I've expressed myself correctly. Generally speaking, regardless of the quality of the product or whether it's paid or not, the revenue curve is the basic presentation. You don't need to get caught up in self-considering whether to present a "perfect" or "imperfect" product. A normal revenue curve is necessary.
After seeing the profit curve, I didn't quite understand it. You can see how your product is plummeting. Honestly, if you put this curve up in the first place, almost no one will look at it anymore. This makes me need to ask you " Very bad? " I expect it to be a problem with my own setup rather than a product problem.
Similarly, a very basic fact remains: you can't expect users to develop interest in your other products after seeing a terrible product that has experienced a "sharp decline" in popularity. Whether it's "reputation" or "brand," an immature product will ruin its reputation. MT5 already has a demo version; it doesn't need to promote itself through a free product.
I'm not sure if I've expressed myself correctly. Generally speaking, regardless of the quality of the product or whether it's paid or not, the revenue curve is the basic presentation. You don't need to get caught up in self-considering whether to present a "perfect" or "imperfect" product. A normal revenue curve is necessary.
After seeing the profit curve, I didn't quite understand it. You can see how your product is plummeting. Honestly, if you put this curve up in the first place, almost no one will look at it anymore. This makes me need to ask you " Very bad? " I expect it to be a problem with my own setup rather than a product problem.
Similarly, a very basic fact remains: you can't expect users to develop interest in your other products after seeing a terrible product that has experienced a "sharp decline" in popularity. Whether it's "reputation" or "brand," an immature product will ruin its reputation. MT5 already has a demo version; it doesn't need to promote itself through a free product.
I understand your perspective on branding and visual presentation. However, in professional algorithmic trading, a revenue curve is merely a mathematical output of specific input parameters—it is a mirror reflecting the setup, not the core logic of the EA.When you see a 'sharp decline,' it does not indicate a flaw in the product's architecture, but rather that the settings applied were mismatched with the market conditions. A sophisticated weapon in the hands of an untrained soldier will not yield victory. As a developer, I build the engine; the performance depends heavily on the driver. I encourage you to look deeper into the parameters and mechanics rather than judging the machinery based on a suboptimal configuration.
Profit of the day by using this amazing robot
Unmanageable EA with huge losses. A $1,000 account was wiped out in just 40 hours. The lots don't match unless the trader opens a $50 risk. The first lot opened was $0.36, which is way too much, and then it goes up to $3.00 and beyond. Not to mention the market trend. The market is in Buy, the expert opens in Sell, and vice versa. There should be more configuration options for greater stability. If this is supposed to be an example of purchasing a paid EA at a certain price, which is then high, it's certainly a bad example. Zero stars from me. There are thousands of EAs that make you lose money. This is one of many.To enhance the EA's intelligence and stability, users must proactively optimize inputs—such as multipliers, step distances, and trend filters—rather than relying on default settings. An EA is a tool, and a tool is only as sharp as the craftsman wielding it. Instead of giving a negative rating to a free product, I encourage you to rigorously test it on Demo or Cent accounts to find the "sweet spot" of parameters before risking real capital.
I apologize for the incorrect comment. You're right, and I thank you for your patience and willingness to donate this AI EA. Indeed, by modifying the settings consistently, the system works. I particularly appreciate the direct opening on the price, neither above nor below, but directly in the direction of the trend. Happy trading, everyone!
I apologize for the incorrect comment. You're right, and I thank you for your patience and willingness to donate this AI EA. Indeed, by modifying the settings consistently, the system works. I particularly appreciate the direct opening on the price, neither above nor below, but directly in the direction of the trend. Happy trading, everyone!
Thank you Bairon75
For this EA to work best, you should set it up as follows:Timeframe: M30 or H1 (KAMA and ADX work extremely well on this timeframe, filtering out noise effectively).
Adjusted Inputs:
InpRewardRatio: Should be set to 2.0 or 2.5 (to ensure that one winning trade compensates for two losing trades).
InpUseRiskUSD: true.
InpRiskUSD: 1% - 2% of your account (for example, if your capital is $1000, set it to $10-20).
InpAegis_Stretch: If you find the EA is not placing enough trades, increase this from 2.5 to 3.0 (loosen the shield slightly).
Conclusion: This is a safe and scientifically sound EA. It doesn't promise doubling or tripling your account in a month like Grid EAs, but it helps you earn money sustainably and protect your capital extremely well.