VectorPrime EA MT5
599 USD
Versione demo scaricata:
871
Pubblicato:
24 agosto 2025
Versione attuale:
1.2
Non hai trovato un robot adatto?
Ordina il tuo
su Freelance
Vai alla sezione Freelance
Ordina il tuo
su Freelance
Come acquistare un Robot di Trading o un indicatore
Esegui il tuo EA
hosting virtuale
hosting virtuale
Prova un indicatore/robot di trading prima di acquistarlo
Vuoi guadagnare nel Market?
Come presentare un prodotto per venderlo con successo
Ti stai perdendo delle opportunità di trading:
- App di trading gratuite
- Oltre 8.000 segnali per il copy trading
- Notizie economiche per esplorare i mercati finanziari
Registrazione
Accedi
Accetti la politica del sito e le condizioni d’uso
Se non hai un account, registrati
BEWARE!! SCAMMER & OVERFIT EAs
Long story short: Maxim’s EAs are all overfit & have huge stop losses. Your account will eventually have large losses. He’s also likely scamming all of us knowing his EAs are not good.
I purchased Axonshift about 3 months ago, then later on Zenith & Vectorprime. Axonshift did well for a couple months. It was trading significantly less than backtests (BT), but it still did ok. Then around mid-November, everything fell apart. Axonshift hit a stop loss (SL), and another trade went within 5 pips of SL less than a week later. Then Vectorprime hit SL, then Zenith hit SL. All of this was within 2 weeks. Mind you, that the win rates for these EAs are 99%+. These EAs are massively overfit, and have crazy reward to risk ratios, where you need 90%+ win rates usually just to break even.
These 3 EAs trade VERY similarly. I see them as copies of each other with different entry times. They were all released within a week of each other. I believe this was to maximize profits. If quality was the focus, he would have continued to develop Axonshift only.
After I purchased his 4th EA, ZenovaFx, I negatively reviewed it to prevent other people from losing massive amounts of money. ZenovaFx, like the others, had 99%+ win rate. Believe it or not, the very first live trade after publication was a full blown SL. Anyone running risk level 2 would have instantly lost 63% of their account. Risk level 1 would have lost 20%. A little after this point, Maxim knew the EA was a failure and removed it completely from MQL5. You can still search for the signal account, which is still live under Maxim’s profile. He abandoned the project a mere 2 weeks after release when it failed, instead of improving it or refunding customers (this would have been the ethical thing to do).
Here’s where things get interesting. Another customer of Maxim reached out to me to point out something strange. Another MQL5 seller by the name “Solomon Din” published the signal for ZenovaFx (with Maxim as author) on Nov. 21, 2025. This was 1 day before Maxim released ZenovaFx (Nov. 22, 2025). How is this possible if “Solomon Din” wasn’t Maxim, or at least affiliated with Maxim? Very peculiar. Furthermore, Solomon Din also has project abandonment (Starspire Capital AI EA & Luminar AI Chat EA) issues and recently released a new EA (CryonX) that operates strikingly similar to Maxim’s EAs. Could it be just coincidence? My beliefs: Maxim has multiple accounts selling similar overfit EAs to people, he knows the EAs don’t work so his business is scamming people into buying them.
Do your own research people. It’s all out there if you go and look. Don’t buy his EAs.
Some stats:
Axonshift
Backtest win rate: 99.55%
TP: 45 pips
SL: 310 pips
87.34% win rate needed to stay even.
1:6.9 reward to risk that ends up being even worse than this since most trades close at breakeven.
Lost 3 out of last 10 trades, which means it needs a straight 21+ trades going to full TP to breakeven.
Live trading winrate: 70%
Vectorprime
Backtest win rate: 99.48%
TP: 27 pips
SL: 310 pips
1:11.6 reward to risk that ends up being even worse than this since most trades close at breakeven.
92.06% win rate needed to stay even.
Lost 2 out of last 9 trades, which means it needs a straight 23+ trades going to full TP to breakeven.
Live winrate: 78%
Zenith
Backtest winrate: 99.00%
TP: 5.7 pips
SL: 49.8 pips
89.69% win rate needed to stay even.
1:8.7 reward to risk that ends up being even worse than this since most trades close at breakeven.
Live win rate: 95% (this is ok now, but it will fail, it’s a matter of time)
I've been using Vectorprime for two months and haven't experienced any losses, with 0% drawdown. I'm eagerly awaiting the Vectorprime 1.3 update, which I hope will improve its performance. I've sent a message to Maxim.
BEWARE!! SCAMMER & OVERFIT EAs
Long story short: Maxim’s EAs are all overfit & have huge stop losses. Your account will eventually have large losses. He’s also likely scamming all of us knowing his EAs are not good.
I purchased Axonshift about 3 months ago, then later on Zenith & Vectorprime. Axonshift did well for a couple months. It was trading significantly less than backtests (BT), but it still did ok. Then around mid-November, everything fell apart. Axonshift hit a stop loss (SL), and another trade went within 5 pips of SL less than a week later. Then Vectorprime hit SL, then Zenith hit SL. All of this was within 2 weeks. Mind you, that the win rates for these EAs are 99%+. These EAs are massively overfit, and have crazy reward to risk ratios, where you need 90%+ win rates usually just to break even.
These 3 EAs trade VERY similarly. I see them as copies of each other with different entry times. They were all released within a week of each other. I believe this was to maximize profits. If quality was the focus, he would have continued to develop Axonshift only.
After I purchased his 4th EA, ZenovaFx, I negatively reviewed it to prevent other people from losing massive amounts of money. ZenovaFx, like the others, had 99%+ win rate. Believe it or not, the very first live trade after publication was a full blown SL. Anyone running risk level 2 would have instantly lost 63% of their account. Risk level 1 would have lost 20%. A little after this point, Maxim knew the EA was a failure and removed it completely from MQL5. You can still search for the signal account, which is still live under Maxim’s profile. He abandoned the project a mere 2 weeks after release when it failed, instead of improving it or refunding customers (this would have been the ethical thing to do).
Here’s where things get interesting. Another customer of Maxim reached out to me to point out something strange. Another MQL5 seller by the name “Solomon Din” published the signal for ZenovaFx (with Maxim as author) on Nov. 21, 2025. This was 1 day before Maxim released ZenovaFx (Nov. 22, 2025). How is this possible if “Solomon Din” wasn’t Maxim, or at least affiliated with Maxim? Very peculiar. Furthermore, Solomon Din also has project abandonment (Starspire Capital AI EA & Luminar AI Chat EA) issues and recently released a new EA (CryonX) that operates strikingly similar to Maxim’s EAs. Could it be just coincidence? My beliefs: Maxim has multiple accounts selling similar overfit EAs to people, he knows the EAs don’t work so his business is scamming people into buying them.
Do your own research people. It’s all out there if you go and look. Don’t buy his EAs.
Some stats:
Axonshift
Backtest win rate: 99.55%
TP: 45 pips
SL: 310 pips
87.34% win rate needed to stay even.
1:6.9 reward to risk that ends up being even worse than this since most trades close at breakeven.
Lost 3 out of last 10 trades, which means it needs a straight 21+ trades going to full TP to breakeven.
Live trading winrate: 70%
Vectorprime
Backtest win rate: 99.48%
TP: 27 pips
SL: 310 pips
1:11.6 reward to risk that ends up being even worse than this since most trades close at breakeven.
92.06% win rate needed to stay even.
Lost 2 out of last 9 trades, which means it needs a straight 23+ trades going to full TP to breakeven.
Live winrate: 78%
Zenith
Backtest winrate: 99.00%
TP: 5.7 pips
SL: 49.8 pips
89.69% win rate needed to stay even.
1:8.7 reward to risk that ends up being even worse than this since most trades close at breakeven.
Live win rate: 95% (this is ok now, but it will fail, it’s a matter of time)
Hi everyone,
I would like to respond calmly and professionally, because this situation has become repetitive and confusing for many readers.
First of all, I fully accept that losses happen — I have never denied this.
Trading involves risk, and no EA in the world can avoid losses forever. I always update my products, communicate openly and improve my systems after difficult periods.
However, what is happening here goes far beyond normal user feedback.
This same user has now posted negative comments on every single EA I have ever released, while at the same time purchasing all of them immediately upon publication — including ZenovaFX, which he bought and reviewed within minutes, before the EA had even executed a single trade.
ZenovaFX was removed only because it received an instant wave of negativity before being tested, not because it “failed.”
I kindly ask everyone to think logically for a moment:
Who buys every EA from a developer if they genuinely “hate” all of them?
Who purchases a brand-new EA instantly, before the market even opens, and leaves a 1-star review without a single trade?
Who spends weeks writing the same long comments under every product?
This behaviour is extremely unusual for a regular customer.
I am not accusing anyone of anything — but I strongly advise other sellers on this platform to be careful when dealing with this user. The pattern is not typical of a trader, and many of you will immediately understand what I mean.
I will continue to work professionally, release improvements, support my clients and maintain transparency.
My results, updates and communication speak for themselves.
To the user:
I wish you well, but I will no longer engage in repeated accusations that have no relation to reality. If you ever want a constructive discussion — my door is open.
And to all honest traders reading this — thank you for your fairness and common sense.