|
Aucun
expérience
|
1
produits
|
652
versions de démo
|
|
0
offres d’emploi
|
2
signaux
|
0
les abonnés
|
Independent Belgian developer of automated trading systems, focused on robustness, execution reliability and risk control.
Over the past years I have designed, tested and run multiple automated trading systems on live capital. Like many developers, I experimented with different approaches early on, including grid and martingale based systems. Some performed well for a period of time, but over the long run they proved too fragile under real market conditions.
That experience shaped how I build strategies today.
I don't believe in "THE PERFECT" systems. Even the best strategies will have losing days, weeks or sometimes months. My goal is not short-term performance, but long-term stability and controlled risk.
Most of my current research and development focuses on Gold (XAUUSD) and volatility-driven systems.
Development updates and live signals are shared on this profile.
Vex's telegram channel(new):
https://t.me/VEXEATRADING
Recommended brokers signup links:
Blackbull: https://go.blackbull.com/visit/?bta=43345&amp ;nci=6766
Ultima Markets: https://ultgo.com/la-com/ENGLISH/LLzl4IK4
EA: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/181523
Low risk: https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2376823
Over the past years I have designed, tested and run multiple automated trading systems on live capital. Like many developers, I experimented with different approaches early on, including grid and martingale based systems. Some performed well for a period of time, but over the long run they proved too fragile under real market conditions.
That experience shaped how I build strategies today.
I don't believe in "THE PERFECT" systems. Even the best strategies will have losing days, weeks or sometimes months. My goal is not short-term performance, but long-term stability and controlled risk.
Most of my current research and development focuses on Gold (XAUUSD) and volatility-driven systems.
Development updates and live signals are shared on this profile.
Vex's telegram channel(new):
https://t.me/VEXEATRADING
Recommended brokers signup links:
Blackbull: https://go.blackbull.com/visit/?bta=43345&amp ;nci=6766
Ultima Markets: https://ultgo.com/la-com/ENGLISH/LLzl4IK4
EA: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/181523
Low risk: https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2376823
Lars Laeremans
The signal is back online after a short pause for technical fine-tuning.
Following a small loss in September, which is a normal part of any trading system, the strategy was reviewed in detail.
Several minor adjustments were made, including risk calibration, trade filtering and execution parameters, with the goal of improving drawdown behavior and overall stability.
No aggressive changes were introduced. The core logic remains unchanged.
The system has shown very stable performance over the past years, with controlled drawdowns of around 10% and a clear focus on consistency rather than short-term optimization.
Trading has now resumed with the updated configuration.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2348838?source=Site+Signals+My
Following a small loss in September, which is a normal part of any trading system, the strategy was reviewed in detail.
Several minor adjustments were made, including risk calibration, trade filtering and execution parameters, with the goal of improving drawdown behavior and overall stability.
No aggressive changes were introduced. The core logic remains unchanged.
The system has shown very stable performance over the past years, with controlled drawdowns of around 10% and a clear focus on consistency rather than short-term optimization.
Trading has now resumed with the updated configuration.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2348838?source=Site+Signals+My
Lars Laeremans
2026.03.01
I deleted the signal because I transferred to a different broker
Lars Laeremans
New Live Signal Available
After many requests, my signal is now live on MQL5.
It is designed as a low-risk, low drawdown strategy (around 3%) focused on steady monthly growth.
The system runs on multiple FX pairs with dynamic position management to smooth equity curves and reduce exposure during volatile periods. Trade sizes are adjusted proportionally to account balance, keeping risk consistent across different capital levels.
This signal is intended for traders who prefer stability, controlled risk and long-term consistency over aggressive short-term gains.
If you got any questions about the signal feel free to message me.
I will release a higher risk signal soon.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2327109?source=Site+Profile
After many requests, my signal is now live on MQL5.
It is designed as a low-risk, low drawdown strategy (around 3%) focused on steady monthly growth.
The system runs on multiple FX pairs with dynamic position management to smooth equity curves and reduce exposure during volatile periods. Trade sizes are adjusted proportionally to account balance, keeping risk consistent across different capital levels.
This signal is intended for traders who prefer stability, controlled risk and long-term consistency over aggressive short-term gains.
If you got any questions about the signal feel free to message me.
I will release a higher risk signal soon.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2327109?source=Site+Profile
Lars Laeremans
Grid trading systems often get a bad reputation, but they are not inherently flawed. The key is strict risk control and intelligent diversification. Without proper lot sizing, maximum drawdown limits, and pair diversification, a grid can quickly become overexposed to a single market move.
When designed with conservative parameters, spread across different currency pairs, and aimed at realistic profit targets, a grid can deliver stable results over the long term.
A well-built grid EA should:
Use controlled position scaling rather than aggressive martingale
Cap total exposure relative to account size
Diversify across uncorrelated pairs to reduce market-specific risk
Adapt to market volatility to avoid overtrading in choppy conditions
Include recovery logic that prioritizes equity protection over forcing every cycle to close in profit
In short, a grid is a tool, dangerous in the wrong hands, powerful in the right ones. It’s not the grid itself that is risky, but how it is configured and managed.
Grid trading systems often get a bad reputation, but they are not inherently flawed. The key is strict risk control and intelligent diversification. Without proper lot sizing, maximum drawdown limits, and pair diversification, a grid can quickly become overexposed to a single market move.
When designed with conservative parameters, spread across different currency pairs, and aimed at realistic profit targets, a grid can deliver stable results over the long term.
A well-built grid EA should:
Use controlled position scaling rather than aggressive martingale
Cap total exposure relative to account size
Diversify across uncorrelated pairs to reduce market-specific risk
Adapt to market volatility to avoid overtrading in choppy conditions
Include recovery logic that prioritizes equity protection over forcing every cycle to close in profit
In short, a grid is a tool, dangerous in the wrong hands, powerful in the right ones. It’s not the grid itself that is risky, but how it is configured and managed.
Lars Laeremans
Why many EAs from One Developer is a Red Flag 🚩
When a developer releases dozens of EAs, it’s not a sign of quality, it’s a business model.
No serious trader/coder can create and maintain 20+ profitable strategies. These products are rarely updated, often built on recycled logic, and lack verified live results.
The goal isn’t performance, it’s volume sales. This signals a seller optimizing for downloads, not a trader solving market inefficiencies. For real traders, that’s a clear red flag.
Publishing that many EAs suggests the developer is earning money, not performance. No trader or developer, no matter how skilled can build, test, and maintain dozens of genuinely profitable systems in parallel. It’s mathematically and operationally unrealistic.
When a developer releases dozens of EAs, it’s not a sign of quality, it’s a business model.
No serious trader/coder can create and maintain 20+ profitable strategies. These products are rarely updated, often built on recycled logic, and lack verified live results.
The goal isn’t performance, it’s volume sales. This signals a seller optimizing for downloads, not a trader solving market inefficiencies. For real traders, that’s a clear red flag.
Publishing that many EAs suggests the developer is earning money, not performance. No trader or developer, no matter how skilled can build, test, and maintain dozens of genuinely profitable systems in parallel. It’s mathematically and operationally unrealistic.
Lars Laeremans
Scale your Live account with a decent risk level.
If you get around 5-10k capital, down scale the risk.
Be patience dont get greedy, or blow the account at own risk.
If you get around 5-10k capital, down scale the risk.
Be patience dont get greedy, or blow the account at own risk.