|
no
esperienza
|
0
prodotti
|
0
versioni demo
|
|
0
lavori
|
2
segnali
|
0
iscritti
|
I’m a full-time algorithmic trader with years of experience designing, testing, and running automated strategies on live capital.
After reviewing and live-testing well over 100 MQL5 Expert Advisors, one conclusion is consistent: the majority are either unprofitable, over-fitted to historical data, or built primarily to generate sales for the developer rather than long-term returns for the trader.
Backtests alone are irrelevant without verified forward/live performance. A serious Expert Advisor should meet at least the following criteria:
1.Verified live history (3–6 months minimum) – A strategy should demonstrate stable performance in real market conditions. Demo or cent accounts are not reliable since execution, spreads and slippage are often very different from standard accounts.
2. Reasonable drawdown relative to returns – It’s not only about how much profit is made, but how safely it is achieved. A system should show a healthy balance between equity growth and risk exposure, with consistent recovery from losing periods.
3. Logical strategy design – Even concepts like grid or martingale can work if they are implemented with strict limits. For example, capped lot sizes, moderate scaling, and margin usage that leaves enough buffer during volatile market phases.
4. Developer track record – An EA is only as strong as its support. A professional developer should maintain and update products responsibly, communicate clearly, and avoid releasing dozens of random EAs without proper long-term maintenance.
5. Stable version history – Constant re-optimization or “major updates” often signals that the system is curve-fitted to the past rather than robust for the future. A strong EA should work consistently across different market conditions without needing to be rebuilt every few months.
6. AVOID any ea that trades XAU/USD, why? Because 99.99% of them won't work. Or not on mql5.
I value transparency and real results over marketing claims. If you need a second opinion on an EA, feel free to reach out. I don’t sell products.
Currently, I also run my own live signal, a low-risk strategy focused on steady growth with controlled drawdowns.
4 of the best performing MQL5 EA strategies combined into one system, focused on controlled risk, drawdown management and long-term consistency.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2348838?source=Site+Signals+My
After reviewing and live-testing well over 100 MQL5 Expert Advisors, one conclusion is consistent: the majority are either unprofitable, over-fitted to historical data, or built primarily to generate sales for the developer rather than long-term returns for the trader.
Backtests alone are irrelevant without verified forward/live performance. A serious Expert Advisor should meet at least the following criteria:
1.Verified live history (3–6 months minimum) – A strategy should demonstrate stable performance in real market conditions. Demo or cent accounts are not reliable since execution, spreads and slippage are often very different from standard accounts.
2. Reasonable drawdown relative to returns – It’s not only about how much profit is made, but how safely it is achieved. A system should show a healthy balance between equity growth and risk exposure, with consistent recovery from losing periods.
3. Logical strategy design – Even concepts like grid or martingale can work if they are implemented with strict limits. For example, capped lot sizes, moderate scaling, and margin usage that leaves enough buffer during volatile market phases.
4. Developer track record – An EA is only as strong as its support. A professional developer should maintain and update products responsibly, communicate clearly, and avoid releasing dozens of random EAs without proper long-term maintenance.
5. Stable version history – Constant re-optimization or “major updates” often signals that the system is curve-fitted to the past rather than robust for the future. A strong EA should work consistently across different market conditions without needing to be rebuilt every few months.
6. AVOID any ea that trades XAU/USD, why? Because 99.99% of them won't work. Or not on mql5.
I value transparency and real results over marketing claims. If you need a second opinion on an EA, feel free to reach out. I don’t sell products.
Currently, I also run my own live signal, a low-risk strategy focused on steady growth with controlled drawdowns.
4 of the best performing MQL5 EA strategies combined into one system, focused on controlled risk, drawdown management and long-term consistency.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2348838?source=Site+Signals+My
Lars Laeremans
Segnale MetaTrader 5 pubblicato
A combination of four proven EA strategies working together to reduce risk and smooth equity growth. Focused on controlled drawdown, stable trade execution and long-term consistency
Lars Laeremans
The signal is back online after a short pause for technical fine-tuning.
Following a small loss in September, which is a normal part of any trading system, the strategy was reviewed in detail.
Several minor adjustments were made, including risk calibration, trade filtering and execution parameters, with the goal of improving drawdown behavior and overall stability.
No aggressive changes were introduced. The core logic remains unchanged.
The system has shown very stable performance over the past years, with controlled drawdowns of around 10% and a clear focus on consistency rather than short-term optimization.
Trading has now resumed with the updated configuration.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2348838?source=Site+Signals+My
Following a small loss in September, which is a normal part of any trading system, the strategy was reviewed in detail.
Several minor adjustments were made, including risk calibration, trade filtering and execution parameters, with the goal of improving drawdown behavior and overall stability.
No aggressive changes were introduced. The core logic remains unchanged.
The system has shown very stable performance over the past years, with controlled drawdowns of around 10% and a clear focus on consistency rather than short-term optimization.
Trading has now resumed with the updated configuration.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2348838?source=Site+Signals+My
Lars Laeremans
New Live Signal Available
After many requests, my signal is now live on MQL5.
It is designed as a low-risk, low drawdown strategy (around 3%) focused on steady monthly growth.
The system runs on multiple FX pairs with dynamic position management to smooth equity curves and reduce exposure during volatile periods. Trade sizes are adjusted proportionally to account balance, keeping risk consistent across different capital levels.
This signal is intended for traders who prefer stability, controlled risk and long-term consistency over aggressive short-term gains.
If you got any questions about the signal feel free to message me.
I will release a higher risk signal soon.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2327109?source=Site+Profile
After many requests, my signal is now live on MQL5.
It is designed as a low-risk, low drawdown strategy (around 3%) focused on steady monthly growth.
The system runs on multiple FX pairs with dynamic position management to smooth equity curves and reduce exposure during volatile periods. Trade sizes are adjusted proportionally to account balance, keeping risk consistent across different capital levels.
This signal is intended for traders who prefer stability, controlled risk and long-term consistency over aggressive short-term gains.
If you got any questions about the signal feel free to message me.
I will release a higher risk signal soon.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2327109?source=Site+Profile
Lars Laeremans
Grid trading systems often get a bad reputation, but they are not inherently flawed. The key is strict risk control and intelligent diversification. Without proper lot sizing, maximum drawdown limits, and pair diversification, a grid can quickly become overexposed to a single market move.
When designed with conservative parameters, spread across different currency pairs, and aimed at realistic profit targets, a grid can deliver stable results over the long term.
A well-built grid EA should:
Use controlled position scaling rather than aggressive martingale
Cap total exposure relative to account size
Diversify across uncorrelated pairs to reduce market-specific risk
Adapt to market volatility to avoid overtrading in choppy conditions
Include recovery logic that prioritizes equity protection over forcing every cycle to close in profit
In short, a grid is a tool, dangerous in the wrong hands, powerful in the right ones. It’s not the grid itself that is risky, but how it is configured and managed.
Grid trading systems often get a bad reputation, but they are not inherently flawed. The key is strict risk control and intelligent diversification. Without proper lot sizing, maximum drawdown limits, and pair diversification, a grid can quickly become overexposed to a single market move.
When designed with conservative parameters, spread across different currency pairs, and aimed at realistic profit targets, a grid can deliver stable results over the long term.
A well-built grid EA should:
Use controlled position scaling rather than aggressive martingale
Cap total exposure relative to account size
Diversify across uncorrelated pairs to reduce market-specific risk
Adapt to market volatility to avoid overtrading in choppy conditions
Include recovery logic that prioritizes equity protection over forcing every cycle to close in profit
In short, a grid is a tool, dangerous in the wrong hands, powerful in the right ones. It’s not the grid itself that is risky, but how it is configured and managed.
Lars Laeremans
Why many EAs from One Developer is a Red Flag 🚩
When a developer releases dozens of EAs, it’s not a sign of quality, it’s a business model.
No serious trader/coder can create and maintain 20+ profitable strategies. These products are rarely updated, often built on recycled logic, and lack verified live results.
The goal isn’t performance, it’s volume sales. This signals a seller optimizing for downloads, not a trader solving market inefficiencies. For real traders, that’s a clear red flag.
Publishing that many EAs suggests the developer is earning money, not performance. No trader or developer, no matter how skilled can build, test, and maintain dozens of genuinely profitable systems in parallel. It’s mathematically and operationally unrealistic.
When a developer releases dozens of EAs, it’s not a sign of quality, it’s a business model.
No serious trader/coder can create and maintain 20+ profitable strategies. These products are rarely updated, often built on recycled logic, and lack verified live results.
The goal isn’t performance, it’s volume sales. This signals a seller optimizing for downloads, not a trader solving market inefficiencies. For real traders, that’s a clear red flag.
Publishing that many EAs suggests the developer is earning money, not performance. No trader or developer, no matter how skilled can build, test, and maintain dozens of genuinely profitable systems in parallel. It’s mathematically and operationally unrealistic.
Lars Laeremans
Scale your Live account with a decent risk level.
If you get around 5-10k capital, down scale the risk.
Be patience dont get greedy, or blow the account at own risk.
If you get around 5-10k capital, down scale the risk.
Be patience dont get greedy, or blow the account at own risk.